Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Aging on Hippocampal-Dependent Spatial Learning
Published on: February 16, 2024
Non-symbolic numerosities do not automatically activate spatial-numerical associations: Evidence from the SNARC
Alexandra A Cleland1, Kathryn Corsico1, Kirstin White1
1School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
This study found no spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect for non-symbolic number representations. Visual cues, not number magnitude, may explain previous findings of SNARC effects with non-symbolic stimuli.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Numerical Cognition
- Perception
Background:
- The spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect links number magnitude to spatial response location.
- While established for symbolic numbers, its occurrence with non-symbolic quantities, especially when irrelevant, is debated.
- Prior research suggested SNARC effects for non-symbolic stimuli, even within the subitizing range.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the presence of SNARC effects using non-symbolic number representations (triangle arrays).
- To determine if SNARC effects occur for non-symbolic quantities when magnitude is task-irrelevant.
- To re-evaluate previous findings on SNARC effects in non-symbolic number processing.
Main Methods:
- Four experiments were conducted using arrays of 1-9 triangles requiring orientation judgments (upwards vs. downwards).
- Stimuli controlled for total surface area across numerosities or varied congruently with numerosity.
- Original stimuli from a prior study (Mitchell et al.) were re-tested in Experiment 4.
Main Results:
- No SNARC effect was observed across the full range of non-symbolic quantities.
- No SNARC effect was found within the subitizing range (typically 1-3 items).
- Experiment 4 suggested that visual properties of stimuli, not numerosity, may drive SNARC-like effects.
Conclusions:
- Non-symbolic representations of number do not appear to provide a direct, automatic pathway for numerical-spatial associations.
- Visual confounds in non-symbolic stimuli may be responsible for previously reported SNARC effects.
- The SNARC effect is likely specific to symbolic number representations or requires careful control of visual features.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Lewis Symbols and the Octet Rule
Elements: Chemical Symbols and Isotopes
Some symbols are derived from the common English name of the element; others are abbreviations of the name in another language — Latin, Greek or German. For example, the symbol for aluminum (common name)...
The Evidence for Evolution
Chemical Symbols
Some symbols are derived from the common name of the element; others are abbreviations of the name in another language. Most symbols have one or two letters, but three-letter symbols have been used...
Numerical Calculations
The solution to a problem is obtained using different methods. While manually solving algebraic symbols is one of the most common methods, the graphical method is often preferred. Computers...
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

