[Comparison of endoscopic features between colorectal sessile serrated adenoma/polyp with or without cytologic...

Objective: To investigate the morphological features of colorectal sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P) and hyperplastic polyp (HP) by white light endoscope (WLE) and Image enhancement endoscope (IEE) . Methods: The data of 7 384 patients who underwent colonoscopy at the Center of Digestive Endoscopy, Peking University International Hospital from August 1, 2016 to February 29, 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. WLE and IEE[Fuji intelligent chromo endoscopy (FICE) or Blue Laser Imaging (BLI) ]were used to compare the morphological features of SSA/P with HP, SSA/P-CD(+)with SSA/P-CD(-). The diagnostic values of endoscopic features in SSA/P and SSA/P-CD(+)were analyzed. Results: A total of 3 401 polyps were detected in 7 384 patients, including 164 SSA/Ps (135 patients). During the same period, there were 270 HPs (223 patients) in accordance with the admission criteria. Compared with HP group, SSA/P group was more common in the right colon with a diameter>5 mm and more likely to be manifested as: Ⅱ-O pit pattern, surface mucus, cumulus-like surface, irregular morphology, VMV, redness, and also more likely to be associated with colon adenoma, colon cancer elsewhere in the colorectum. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.01). Compared with SSA/P-CD(-)group, SSA/P-CD(+)group was more common in the right colon with a diameter>5 mm and more likely to be manifested as: Ⅱ-O pit pattern, surface mucus, cumulus-like surface, irregular morphology, VMV. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.001). The differential diagnosis between SSA/P and HP was predicted by combining any two endoscopic morphological features (right colon, Ⅱ-O pit pattern, surface mucus, cumulus surface, irregular morphology, VMV, diameter>5 mm, at least 2 of 7 endoscopic features). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 59.15%, 95.56%, 81.80%, 13.32 and 0.43, respectively. Similarly, the differential diagnosis between SSA/P-CD(+) and HP was predicted. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 92.16%, 95.56%, 95.02%, 20.76 and 0.08, respectively. Conclusion: Comprehensive analysis of the WLE and FICE/BLI morphological features of the lesions can effectively distinguish SSA/P from HP, especially SSA/P-CD(+) from HP.