Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.9K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.9K
Generator Voltage Control01:21

Generator Voltage Control

638
Generator voltage control is crucial for maintaining the stable operation of synchronous generators and wind turbines. In older models, a DC generator driven by the rotor delivers DC power to the rotor's field winding, and the power is transferred through slip rings and brushes. In the latest models, static or brushless exciters are used. Static exciters rectify AC power from the generator terminals and then transfer the DC power directly to the rotor. Brushless exciters, on the other hand, use...
638
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data01:12

Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data

687
Analysis of population pharmacokinetic data involves studying the behavior of drugs within diverse populations to understand their pharmacokinetic parameters. Traditional pharmacokinetic methods typically involve collecting samples from a few individuals and estimating these parameters. While these methods are commonly used, they have limitations in capturing the variability in drug response among individuals or heterogeneous populations. Population pharmacokinetics is employed to address these...
687
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

459
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
459
Overview of Microsoft Excel as a Data Analysis Tool01:13

Overview of Microsoft Excel as a Data Analysis Tool

1.5K
Microsoft Excel is a cornerstone tool for data analysis and statistical operations, offering a wide array of functionalities to manage, analyze, and visualize data efficiently. Recognized for its versatility, Excel facilitates the performance of basic to complex statistical operations, serving as an indispensable asset for analysts, researchers, and students alike. Excel's significance in data analysis emanates from its spreadsheet environment, where data can be organized in rows and...
1.5K
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials01:12

Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials

1.4K
Statistical software is pivotal in data analysis and clinical trials by providing tools to analyze data, draw conclusions, and make predictions. These software packages range from simple data management applications to complex analytical platforms, supporting various statistical tests, models, and simulation techniques. Their significance lies in their ability to handle vast amounts of data with precision and efficiency, enabling researchers to validate hypotheses, identify trends, and make...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Artificial Intelligence-Guided Lung Ultrasound by Nonexperts.

JAMA cardiology·2025
Same author

G4 & the balanced metric family - a novel approach to solving binary classification problems in medical device validation & verification studies.

BioData mining·2024
Same author

Predictors of Hospital Readmission in Patients Undergoing Creation of an Intestinal Ostomy.

Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society·2023
Same author

Bias in Sunscreen SPF Testing: A Review of Published Data.

Journal of cosmetic science·2020
Same author

Accuracy and user performance evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system which wirelessly transmits results to compatible insulin pumps.

Current medical research and opinion·2020
Same author

Non-comedogenic and non-acnegenic claim substantiation.

Journal of cosmetic science·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Bidirectional Retroviral Integration Site PCR Methodology and Quantitative Data Analysis Workflow
12:53

Bidirectional Retroviral Integration Site PCR Methodology and Quantitative Data Analysis Workflow

Published on: June 14, 2017

11.2K

Disparate SPF Testing Methodologies Generate Similar SPFs. II. Analysis of P2 Standard Control SPF Data.

Melannie Alejandria1, Andrew Marra1, Glenn Roberts1

  • 1Consumer Product Testing Company, Inc., Fairfield, NJ (M.A., A.M., G.R., M.C.).

Journal of Cosmetic Science
|August 24, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sun Protection Factor (SPF) testing methodologies, including the 2011 FDA-Final Rule and ISO 24444, show no significant differences in results for sunscreen formulations. SPF values are independent of testing conditions and subject characteristics.

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.3K
Protocol for Data Collection and Analysis Applied to Automated Facial Expression Analysis Technology and Temporal Analysis for Sensory Evaluation
07:12

Protocol for Data Collection and Analysis Applied to Automated Facial Expression Analysis Technology and Temporal Analysis for Sensory Evaluation

Published on: August 26, 2016

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Bidirectional Retroviral Integration Site PCR Methodology and Quantitative Data Analysis Workflow
12:53

Bidirectional Retroviral Integration Site PCR Methodology and Quantitative Data Analysis Workflow

Published on: June 14, 2017

11.2K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.3K
Protocol for Data Collection and Analysis Applied to Automated Facial Expression Analysis Technology and Temporal Analysis for Sensory Evaluation
07:12

Protocol for Data Collection and Analysis Applied to Automated Facial Expression Analysis Technology and Temporal Analysis for Sensory Evaluation

Published on: August 26, 2016

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Cosmetic Science
  • Photobiology

Background:

  • Previous studies indicated no significant difference in Sun Protection Factor (SPF) among older sunscreen testing methodologies.
  • Current sunscreen SPF testing predominantly utilizes the 2011 FDA-Final Rule and ISO 24444 standards.
  • Evaluating methodological impact through control standards is a key approach in sunscreen research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the SPF values of a reference sunscreen (P2) using the 2011 FDA-Final Rule and ISO 24444 methodologies.
  • To determine if statistically significant differences exist between these two prevalent SPF testing standards.
  • To explore the influence of various factors on SPF test results.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of SPF data for sunscreen P2 using the 2011 FDA-Final Rule and ISO 24444.
  • Statistical evaluation using least squares average and standard error on a large dataset (952 observations for FDA, 1551 for ISO).
  • Correlation analysis to assess the relationship between SPF and subject characteristics (age, gender, skin type) and minimal erythemal dose.

Main Results:

  • No clinically significant or statistically significant difference was found in the average SPF of P2 between the 2011 FDA-Final Rule and ISO 24444 methodologies.
  • The average SPF of P2 was found to be independent of solar simulator type, time of year, subject age, gender, and Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype.
  • A statistically significant negative correlation was observed between a subject's SPF of P2 and their unprotected minimal erythemal dose.

Conclusions:

  • The 2011 FDA-Final Rule and ISO 24444 methodologies yield comparable SPF results for sunscreen formulations.
  • Subject and environmental factors do not significantly impact the average SPF results obtained by these standardized methods.
  • The inverse relationship between SPF and minimal erythemal dose warrants further investigation for its implications in SPF testing.