Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias01:22

Bias

6.9K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
6.9K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.1K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.1K
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD01:11

Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD

3.1K
A complete procedure of testing the hypothesis about a population mean is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
3.1K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

293
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
293
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

12.7K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
12.7K
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation01:16

Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation

106
Body:The statistical interpretation of bioequivalence data is a significant aspect of pharmaceutical research. Bioequivalence refers to the absence of any significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient in pharmaceutical products becomes available at the site of drug action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions. This helps determine if different drug products have similar absorption rates, ensuring their interchangeability.Statistical...
106

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Artificial Intelligence-Guided Lung Ultrasound by Nonexperts.

JAMA cardiology·2025
Same author

G4 & the balanced metric family - a novel approach to solving binary classification problems in medical device validation & verification studies.

BioData mining·2024
Same author

Predictors of Hospital Readmission in Patients Undergoing Creation of an Intestinal Ostomy.

Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society·2023
Same author

Accuracy and user performance evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system which wirelessly transmits results to compatible insulin pumps.

Current medical research and opinion·2020
Same author

Disparate SPF Testing Methodologies Generate Similar SPFs. II. Analysis of P2 Standard Control SPF Data.

Journal of cosmetic science·2019
Same author

Non-comedogenic and non-acnegenic claim substantiation.

Journal of cosmetic science·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing
06:24

Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing

Published on: May 28, 2013

42.6K

Bias in Sunscreen SPF Testing: A Review of Published Data.

Trina Ricci1, Andrew Marra1, Karen Rauen1

  • 1Consumer Product Testing Company, Inc., Fairfield, NJ (T.R., A.M., K.R., M.C.).

Journal of Cosmetic Science
|October 6, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Subversion bias can compromise sunscreen efficacy testing. Exploiting historical subject responses could skew sun protection factor (SPF) results, impacting data validity.

More Related Videos

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response
06:31

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response

Published on: October 3, 2019

9.0K
Studying Chronic Exposure of Mice to Ultraviolet B Radiation
03:20

Studying Chronic Exposure of Mice to Ultraviolet B Radiation

Published on: August 19, 2025

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing
06:24

Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing

Published on: May 28, 2013

42.6K
Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response
06:31

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response

Published on: October 3, 2019

9.0K
Studying Chronic Exposure of Mice to Ultraviolet B Radiation
03:20

Studying Chronic Exposure of Mice to Ultraviolet B Radiation

Published on: August 19, 2025

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Selection bias, specifically subversion bias, can undermine the validity of clinical trial data.
  • Sunscreen efficacy testing relies on subject responses, making it potentially vulnerable to recruitment manipulation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the potential for subversion bias in sunscreen sun protection factor (SPF) testing.
  • To assess the consistency of individual subject responses in SPF trials.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of SPF data from multiple clinical trials involving the sunscreen standard P2.
  • Identification of subjects with consistently high or low SPF values across multiple observations.
  • Calculation of the variation in SPF values among subjects.

Main Results:

  • A significant portion of subjects (35 out of 286) exhibited consistently extreme SPF values (either high or low).
  • A substantial difference (7.5 SPF units or 61%) was observed between the highest and lowest average SPF values recorded for individual subjects.
  • Established correlation between lower minimal erythemal dose (MED) and higher SPF values.

Conclusions:

  • Consistent individual responses suggest potential for subversion bias in SPF testing.
  • Recruitment strategies leveraging historical SPF data could introduce bias and explain inter-facility variations.
  • Awareness of subversion bias is crucial for maintaining the integrity of sunscreen efficacy studies.