Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Accurate Determination of the Equilibrium Surface Tension Values with Area Perturbation Tests
Published on: August 30, 2019
Statistical significance testing and p-values: Defending the indefensible? A discussion paper and position statement
Peter Griffiths1, Jack Needleman2
1University of Southampton, UK and Executive Editor, International Journal of Nursing Studies, United Kingdom.
Statistical significance tests and p-values are often misinterpreted. Researchers should prioritize effect sizes and confidence intervals for clearer interpretation of study results.
Area of Science:
- Statistics
- Scientific Research Methodology
Background:
- Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is prevalent in statistical education and research.
- Misinterpretations of statistical significance and p-values are common and persistent.
- The arbitrary p < 0.05 threshold is frequently criticized, with some advocating for the complete removal of p-values.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline problems associated with significance testing and p-values.
- To offer examples of misinterpretations from nursing research.
- To discuss potential solutions and provide guidance for reporting statistical analyses.
Main Methods:
- Review of statistical testing practices and common misinterpretations.
- Analysis of examples from the International Journal of Nursing Studies.
- Discussion of alternative reporting methods and proposed guidelines.
Main Results:
- P-values and significance tests are intrinsically misleading and do not accurately represent effect size or importance.
- Point estimates and confidence intervals provide direct information on effect size and uncertainty.
- Over-reliance on arbitrary p-value cutoffs hinders the understanding of results.
Conclusions:
- Authors and journals should emphasize effect sizes and confidence intervals over p-values.
- The use of arbitrary cutoffs (e.g., p < 0.05) for decision-making should be avoided.
- When reporting statistical analyses, clarity regarding 'statistical significance' versus 'importance' is crucial, with a recommendation to use effect sizes for the latter.
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Significance
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
Significance Testing: Overview
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Biodiversity and Human Values
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...

