Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.2K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.2K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

1.1K
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.1K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

915
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
915
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

9.9K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
9.9K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.3K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.3K
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies01:11

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

217
Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...
217

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Design guidelines for animated data visualization based on perceptual capacity limits.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

Here's what you need to know about my data: Exploring Expert Knowledge's Role in Data Analysis.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2025
Same author

Reframing Pattern: A Comprehensive Approach to a Composite Visual Variable.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2025
Same author

Entanglements for Visualization: Changing Research Outcomes through Feminist Theory.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2024
Same author

Constraint-Based Breakpoints for Responsive Visualization Design and Development.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2024
Same author

Challenges and Opportunities in Data Visualization Education: A Call to Action.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2023
Same journal

MesoSplats: Texture Synthesis with Gaussian Splatting.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same journal

GLLA: A Unified Force-Directed Graph Layout Framework Supporting Local Adjustments.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same journal

Multi-Perception Crowd: Learning to combine entity and implicit perception for diverse crowd simulation.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same journal

Hiding in Plain Sight: Camouflaging Real-world Objects.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same journal

RTF2Mesh: Restricted Tangent Face Based Mesh Compression With Neural Displacement Fields.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same journal

Practical Occluder Generation for Mobile Games.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

17.1K

Criteria for Rigor in Visualization Design Study.

Miriah Meyer, Jason Dykes

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
    |August 24, 2019
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study proposes a new interpretivist perspective on visualization design study, emphasizing design as inquiry. It introduces six criteria for rigor: informed, reflexive, abundant, plausible, resonant, and transparent, to enhance research quality.

    More Related Videos

    Designing Automated, High-throughput, Continuous Cell Growth Experiments Using eVOLVER
    07:26

    Designing Automated, High-throughput, Continuous Cell Growth Experiments Using eVOLVER

    Published on: May 19, 2019

    12.7K
    Scalable Nanohelices for Predictive Studies and Enhanced 3D Visualization
    08:03

    Scalable Nanohelices for Predictive Studies and Enhanced 3D Visualization

    Published on: November 12, 2014

    10.9K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jan 20, 2026

    Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
    20:24

    Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

    Published on: January 31, 2014

    17.1K
    Designing Automated, High-throughput, Continuous Cell Growth Experiments Using eVOLVER
    07:26

    Designing Automated, High-throughput, Continuous Cell Growth Experiments Using eVOLVER

    Published on: May 19, 2019

    12.7K
    Scalable Nanohelices for Predictive Studies and Enhanced 3D Visualization
    08:03

    Scalable Nanohelices for Predictive Studies and Enhanced 3D Visualization

    Published on: November 12, 2014

    10.9K

    Area of Science:

    • Information Visualization
    • Human-Computer Interaction
    • Design Research

    Background:

    • Current research in visualization design study lacks a unified framework for assessing rigor.
    • Existing approaches often overlook the subjective and socially constructed nature of knowledge in design research.
    • There is a need for a more nuanced understanding of design as a method of inquiry within visualization.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a new interpretivist perspective on visualization design study.
    • To develop and present six criteria for establishing and judging rigor in this field.
    • To stimulate dialogue on the nature of knowledge and rigor in visualization research.

    Main Methods:

    • Constructed a new perspective through a four-year engagement with discourse on rigor and knowledge in social science, information systems, and design.
    • Developed six criteria for rigor: Informed, Reflexive, Abundant, Plausible, Resonant, and Transparent (I.R.A.P.R.T.).
    • Explored implications through provocative questions and suggested methods from cognate disciplines.

    Main Results:

    • Proposed six criteria for rigor in visualization design study: Informed, Reflexive, Abundant, Plausible, Resonant, and Transparent.
    • Identified that the visualization discipline is not yet well-positioned to fully embrace an interpretivist approach to design study.
    • Highlighted the need for methods supporting rigor in planning, execution, and reporting of design studies.

    Conclusions:

    • Visualization design study benefits from an interpretivist perspective that views design as inquiry.
    • The proposed criteria (Informed, Reflexive, Abundant, Plausible, Resonant, Transparent) offer a framework for rigorous research.
    • Further dialogue and adaptation are needed for the visualization field to fully leverage rigorous interpretivist design study.