Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Crossing Over01:34

Crossing Over

169.3K
Unlike mitosis, meiosis aims for genetic diversity in its creation of haploid gametes. Dividing germ cells first begin this process in prophase I, where each chromosome—replicated in S phase—is now composed of two sister chromatids (identical copies) joined centrally.
The homologous pairs of sister chromosomes—one from the maternal and one from the paternal genome—then begin to align alongside each other lengthwise, matching corresponding DNA positions in a process...
169.3K
Crossing Over01:30

Crossing Over

6.3K
Crossing over is the exchange of genetic information between homologous chromosomes during prophase I of meiosis I. Genetic recombination gives rise to allelic diversity in the newly formed daughter cells. In humans, crossing over produces genetically distinct haploid egg and sperm cells that undergo fertilization to produce unique offspring. Before cell division starts, the germ cell’s chromosome(s) undergo duplication in the S phase of the cell cycle. As the cells enter prophase I,...
6.3K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.7K
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

12.4K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
12.4K
Monohybrid Crosses01:20

Monohybrid Crosses

238.8K
Overview
238.8K
Dihybrid Crosses01:18

Dihybrid Crosses

80.9K
Overview
80.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

People accept breaks in the causal chain between crime and punishment.

Memory & cognition·2024
Same author

Probability and intentional action.

Cognitive psychology·2023
Same author

Actual knowledge.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2021
Same author

Visual Self-Motion Feedback Affects the Sense of Self in Virtual Reality.

Multisensory research·2021
Same author

Knowledge before belief.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2020
Same author

Deciding Without Intending.

Journal of cognition·2020
Same journal

Pronoun Resolution in Turkish: The Interplay of Referential Form, Word Order, and Implicit Causality.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

What's in a Color?: Language, Synesthesia, and Categorical Perception.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Reasoning Beyond Explicit Rules: Adults' and Children's Use of Closure Principles in Novel Cases.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Intermediary Object States Are Activated by Sentences Describing Completed Events.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Large Language Models Estimate Fine-Grained Human Color-Concept Associations.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Computational Models of Causal Reasoning: Bayesian Accounts of Normative Violations.

Cognitive science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 20, 2026

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

7.4K

Excuse Validation: A Cross-cultural Study.

John Turri1

  • 1Philosophy Department and Cognitive Science Program, University of Waterloo.

Cognitive Science
|August 26, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People often excuse unintentional rule-breaking, a phenomenon called excuse validation. This study found excuse validation occurs similarly in Korean and American adults, and increases with age.

Keywords:
BlameExcuse validationMoral psychologyPunishmentRules

More Related Videos

A Human Blood-Brain Interface Model to Study Barrier Crossings by Pathogens or Medicines and Their Interactions with the Brain
07:52

A Human Blood-Brain Interface Model to Study Barrier Crossings by Pathogens or Medicines and Their Interactions with the Brain

Published on: April 9, 2019

9.2K
In Vivo Protocol of Controlled Subconcussive Head Impacts for the Validation of Field Study Data
06:14

In Vivo Protocol of Controlled Subconcussive Head Impacts for the Validation of Field Study Data

Published on: April 18, 2019

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 20, 2026

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

7.4K
A Human Blood-Brain Interface Model to Study Barrier Crossings by Pathogens or Medicines and Their Interactions with the Brain
07:52

A Human Blood-Brain Interface Model to Study Barrier Crossings by Pathogens or Medicines and Their Interactions with the Brain

Published on: April 9, 2019

9.2K
In Vivo Protocol of Controlled Subconcussive Head Impacts for the Validation of Field Study Data
06:14

In Vivo Protocol of Controlled Subconcussive Head Impacts for the Validation of Field Study Data

Published on: April 18, 2019

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Cross-cultural Psychology
  • Moral Psychology

Background:

  • The concept of rule-breaking typically implies intent, yet individuals may be excused for unintentional transgressions.
  • Excuse validation, where unintentional rule-breaking is deemed not a violation, has been observed in American adults.
  • The cross-cultural robustness and underlying mechanisms of excuse validation remain underexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the cross-cultural prevalence of excuse validation in Korean and American adults.
  • To explore potential explanations for excuse validation, linking it to competing forces within human norm psychology.
  • To examine demographic factors, such as age, influencing excuse validation.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-cultural study comparing excuse validation levels between Korean and American adult participants.
  • Qualitative and quantitative analyses to assess judgments of rule-breaking in scenarios involving unintentional transgressions.
  • Exploration of psychological factors contributing to excuse validation.

Main Results:

  • Both American and Korean adults exhibited similar levels of excuse validation.
  • Participants were divided, with approximately half judging unintentional rule-breaking as not a violation.
  • Older adults were significantly more likely to engage in excuse validation compared to younger adults.

Conclusions:

  • Excuse validation is not unique to American moral psychology and appears cross-culturally robust.
  • Competing forces within human norm psychology may explain the phenomenon of excuse validation.
  • Age is a significant factor influencing the tendency to validate excuses for rule-breaking.