Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements in X-ray CT Tool Chain for Tree Core Analysis
Published on: September 22, 2023
Comparison of three undersampling approaches in computed tomography reconstruction
Chenyang Shen1, Yifei Lou2, Liyuan Chen1
1Innovative Technology of Radiotherapy Computations and Hardware (iTORCH) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Background:
Projection data undersampling is an effective approach to reduce X-ray radiation dose in computed tomography (CT). In modern CT technologies, undersampling is also a favorable method to reduce projection data size to facilitate rapid CT scan and imaging. It is an intriguing question that given an undersampling ratio, what is the optimal undersampling approach that enables the best CT image reconstruction. While this is in general a challenging mathematical question, it is the motivation of this paper to compare three types of undersampling operations, which we hope to shed some light to this question.
Methods:
We considered regular view undersampling that acquires X-ray projections at equiangular projection angles, regular ray undersampling that acquires projections at all angles but with X-ray lines blocked within each projection under a periodic pattern, and random ray undersampling that acquires each X-ray line with a certain probability. By representing the undersampling projection operators under the basis of singular vectors of full projection operator, we generated matrix representations of these undersampling operators and numerically perform singular value decomposition (SVD). Singular value spectra and singular vectors were compared.
Results:
For a given undersampling ratio, the random ray undersampling approach preserves the properties of the full projection operator better than the other two approaches. This translates to advantages of reconstructing a CT image at a lower error, which has also been demonstrated in the numerical experiments.
Conclusions:
We compared three undersampling strategies and found that random undersampling preserves the most information and outperforms the other two in terms of reconstruction quality.
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Electron Microscope Tomography and Single-particle Reconstruction
Electron Tomography
Electron tomography can be performed either in TEM or STEM (scanning transmission...
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

