Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Indirect Fabrication of Lattice Metals with Thin Sections Using Centrifugal Casting
Published on: May 14, 2016
Accuracy of removable partial denture framework fabricated by casting with a 3D printed pattern and selective laser
Akinori Tasaka1, Takahiro Shimizu2, Yoshimitsu Kato2
1Department of Removable Partial Prosthodontics, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan; Oral Health Science Center, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
3D-printed pattern casting and selective laser sintering (SLS) methods for removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks show different accuracies. The study found variations in component fit, indicating method-specific precision for dental prosthetics.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials and Dental Technology
- Additive Manufacturing in Dentistry
- Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Background:
- Removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks are crucial for restoring oral function and aesthetics.
- Advancements in digital dentistry offer new fabrication methods, including 3D-printed pattern casting and selective laser sintering (SLS).
- Evaluating the accuracy of these novel manufacturing techniques is essential for clinical success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the fabrication accuracy of RPD frameworks produced by 3D-printed pattern casting (AM-Cast) versus those made by selective laser sintering (SLS).
- To identify specific areas of discrepancy between the two manufacturing methods.
Main Methods:
- A partially edentulous mandibular model was scanned, and the RPD framework was designed using CAD software.
- Two fabrication methods were employed: AM-Cast (3D-printed resin pattern followed by casting) and SLS (direct metal laser sintering).
- Fabrication accuracy was assessed by 3D scanning the frameworks, overlapping the data with the design, and statistically comparing discrepancies using the Mann-Whitney U test.
Main Results:
- Both AM-Cast and SLS frameworks exhibited discrepancies compared to the design data, with ranges of -0.185±0.138 to 0.352±0.143mm for AM-Cast and -0.166±0.009 to 0.123±0.009mm for SLS.
- Statistically significant differences in accuracy were noted across various framework components, including rests, proximal plates, connectors, and clasp arms.
- AM-Cast frameworks showed larger lateral discrepancies in connectors, while SLS frameworks presented localized discrepancies in the lingual bar.
Conclusions:
- The accuracy of RPD frameworks fabricated by AM-Cast and SLS is component-dependent.
- Both digital fabrication methods present unique accuracy profiles that must be considered during framework design and manufacturing.
- Further research may be needed to optimize these techniques for improved RPD framework precision.
Related Concept Videos
08:32Indirect Fabrication of Lattice Metals with Thin Sections Using Centrifugal Casting
08:31Fabrication of Engineered Vascular Flaps Using 3D Printing Technologies
08:35Hybrid Printing for the Fabrication of Smart Sensors
10:49Printing Thermoresponsive Reverse Molds for the Creation of Patterned Two-component Hydrogels for 3D Cell Culture
08:28Stereolithographic 3D Printing with Renewable Acrylates
08:16Fabrication of Custom Agarose Wells for Cell Seeding and Tissue Ring Self-assembly Using 3D-Printed Molds

