Network inference from the timing of events in coupled dynamical systems
Forough Hassanibesheli1, Reik V Donner1
1Research Domain IV-Complexity Science, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research-Member of the Leibniz Society, Telegrafenberg A31, 14473 Potsdam, Germany.
Researchers can infer network structures by analyzing event timing data from spreading phenomena. Event Coincidence Analysis (ECA) accurately reconstructs sparser networks, outperforming denser ones.
Area of Science:
- Complex Systems
- Network Science
- Computational Social Science
Background:
- Spreading phenomena, such as opinion formation and disease propagation, are influenced by underlying network structures.
- While network topology's effect on spreading is well-studied, inferring network structure from observed event timings remains a challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the inverse problem of inferring unknown network structures from the timing of events observed at different nodes.
- To evaluate the accuracy of network reconstruction using statistical similarity of event timings.
Main Methods:
- Numerical investigation of two event-based stochastic processes: a generic event propagation model and a variant of the SIRS epidemiological model.
- Analysis of pairwise statistical similarity between event timing sequences using event synchronization and Event Coincidence Analysis (ECA).
- Using functional connectivity (mutual similarity of event sequences) as a proxy for structural connectivity (physical links).
Main Results:
- Both event synchronization and ECA can achieve reasonable accuracy in predicting network structures.
- Sparser networks are generally reconstructed more accurately than denser ones, particularly for larger networks.
- ECA demonstrates superior reconstruction accuracy compared to event synchronization for sparser, larger networks.
Conclusions:
- Event timing analysis, particularly ECA, offers a viable method for inferring network structures from spreading phenomena.
- The accuracy of network reconstruction is dependent on network sparsity and size, with sparser networks yielding better results.
Related Concept Videos
10:44Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline
10:10Analyzing the Size, Shape, and Directionality of Networks of Coupled Astrocytes
09:40Imaging G-protein Coupled Receptor (GPCR)-mediated Signaling Events that Control Chemotaxis of Dictyostelium Discoideum
08:42Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device (ALDM) Test Systems
Categories and Inductive Inferences
It might be possible for the human brain to keep track of each individual person, place, or thing encountered, but that would be a very inefficient use of time and cognitive resources. Instead, humans develop categories. Categories are mental representations of real things that can be used for a variety of purposes. For example, individuals can use the perceptual features of animals to place them into a...
07:57Quantification of Protein Interaction Network Dynamics using Multiplexed Co-Immunoprecipitation


