Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.0K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.0K
Just-noticeable Differences07:30

Just-noticeable Differences

16.0K
Source: Laboratory of Jonathan Flombaum—Johns Hopkins University
Psychophysics is a branch of psychology and neuroscience that tries to explain how physical quantities are translated into neural firing and mental representations of magnitude. One set of questions in this area pertains to just-noticeable differences (JND): How much does something need to change in order for the change to be perceivable? To pump intuitions about this, consider the fact that small children grow at an...
16.0K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.6K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.6K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.1K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.1K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

1.3K
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.3K
Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform01:24

Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform

625
The z-transform is a powerful tool for analyzing practical discrete-time systems, often represented by linear difference equations. Solving a higher-order difference equation requires knowledge of the input signal and the initial conditions up to one term less than the order of the equation.
The z-transform facilitates handling delayed signals by shifting the signal in the z-domain, which corresponds to delaying the signal in the time domain, and advancing signals by similarly shifting in the...
625

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporal integration of infrasound at threshold.

PloS one·2023
Same author

The effect of sensorineural hearing loss on suprathreshold perception of tonal components in noise.

JASA express letters·2023
Same author

Modelling suppression and comodulation masking release using the dual-resonance nonlinear filter.

JASA express letters·2022
Same author

Effect of Contralateral Noise on Speech Intelligibility.

Neuroscience·2021
Same author

Comodulation masking release with random variations of flanking-band center frequencies.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2020
Same author

The effect of silent gaps on temporal weights in loudness judgments.

Hearing research·2020
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.0K

Comodulation detection difference and binaural unmasking.

Jesko L Verhey1, Marc Nitschmann1

  • 1Department of Experimental Audiology, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Straße 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germanyjesko.verhey@med.ovgu.de, marc.nitschmann@uni-oldenburg.de.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|September 2, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explored how binaural cues and comodulation affect sound perception. Results show spectral distance impacts masking, while comodulation detection is independent of target frequency and interaural correlation.

More Related Videos

Measuring Just-noticeable Differences Using Shape Size Changes
07:30

Measuring Just-noticeable Differences Using Shape Size Changes

Published on: April 30, 2023

16.0K
Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila
09:34

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila

Published on: August 22, 2013

15.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.0K
Measuring Just-noticeable Differences Using Shape Size Changes
07:30

Measuring Just-noticeable Differences Using Shape Size Changes

Published on: April 30, 2023

16.0K
Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila
09:34

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila

Published on: August 22, 2013

15.0K

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal processing

Background:

  • Understanding auditory masking is crucial for hearing research.
  • Binaural cues and envelope comodulation are key factors in sound localization and segregation.
  • Investigating their combined effects provides insight into auditory system processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the interplay between binaural cues and across-frequency envelope correlation (comodulation) in auditory masking.
  • To determine how spectral separation between a target and masker influences binaural masking release.
  • To assess the independence of comodulation processing from target frequency and interaural correlation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized narrowband noise to mask a narrowband target noise.
  • Compared auditory thresholds under diotic (same in both ears) and dichotic (different in ears) listening conditions.
  • Measured the comodulation detection difference (CDD) under varying spectral distances, target frequencies, and interaural correlations.

Main Results:

  • Masking threshold differences between diotic and dichotic conditions decreased as the spectral distance between the masker and target increased.
  • This effect of spectral distance was independent of the across-frequency envelope correlation.
  • The comodulation detection difference remained constant across different target frequencies and interaural correlation values.

Conclusions:

  • Spectral distance is a significant factor in binaural masking release, independent of envelope correlation.
  • The auditory system processes comodulation and binaural cues, specifically interaural phase, as independent features.
  • These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of auditory scene analysis and sound perception mechanisms.