Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Mechanoluminescent Visualization of Crack Propagation for Joint Evaluation
Published on: January 6, 2023
Evaluation of predicted patellofemoral joint kinematics with a moving-axis joint model
C M Dzialo1, P H Pedersen2, K K Jensen3
1AnyBody Technology, A/S Niels Jernes Vej 10, DK 9220 Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Materials and Production, Aalborg University, Fibigerstræde 16, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark.
Abstract:
The main objectives of this study were to expand the moving-axis joint model concept to the patellofemoral joint and evaluate the patellar motion against experimental patellofemoral kinematics. The experimental data was obtained through 2D-to-3D bone reconstruction of EOS images and segmented MRI data utilizing an iterative closest point optimization technique. Six knee model variations were developed using the AnyBody Modeling System and subject-specific bone geometries. These models consisted of various combinations of tibiofemoral (hinge, moving-axis, and interpolated) and patellofemoral (hinge and moving-axis) joint types. The newly introduced interpolated tibiofemoral joint is calibrated from the five EOS quasi-static lunge positions. The patellofemoral axis of the hinge model was defined by performing surface fits to the patellofemoral contact area; and the moving-axis model was defined based upon the position of the patellofemoral joint at 0° and 90° tibiofemoral-flexion. In between these angles, the patellofemoral axis moved linearly as a function of tibiofemoral-flexion, while outside these angles, the axis remained fixed. When using a moving-axis tibiofemoral joint, a hinge patellofemoral joint offers (-5.12 ± 1.23 mm, 5.81 ± 0.97 mm, 14.98 ± 2.30°, -4.35 ± 1.95°) mean differences (compared to EOS) while a moving-axis patellofemoral model provides (-2.69 ± 1.04 mm, 1.13 ± 0.80 mm, 12.63 ± 2.03°, 1.74 ± 1.46°) in terms of lateral-shift, superior translation, patellofemoral-flexion, and patellar-rotation, respectively. Furthermore, the model predictive capabilities increased as a direct result of adding more calibrated positions to the tibiofemoral model (hinge-1, moving-axis-2, and interpolated-5). Overall, a novel subject-specific moving-axis patellofemoral model has been established; that produces realistic patellar motion and is computationally fast enough for clinical applications.
Related Concept Videos
04:58Mechanoluminescent Visualization of Crack Propagation for Joint Evaluation
12:44Creation of a Knee Joint-on-a-Chip for Modeling Joint Diseases and Testing Drugs
Structural Joints: Synovial Joints
Structural Joints: Fibrous Joints
Suture
All the bones of the skull, except for the mandible, are joined to each other by a fibrous joint called a suture. The fibrous connective tissue found at a suture strongly unites the adjacent skull bones and thus helps to protect the brain and form the face. In...
Structural Joints: Cartilaginous Joints
There are two types of cartilaginous joints:
Synchondrosis
A synchondrosis ("joined by cartilage") is a cartilaginous joint where bones are connected by hyaline cartilage. Synchondrosis may be temporary...
Joints
Structural joint classifications are based on the material that makes up the joint as well as whether or not the joint contains a space between the bones. Joints are structurally classified as fibrous, cartilaginous, or synovial.
Fibrous Joints Are Immovable
The bones of a...

