Comparison of NIR Versus SWIR Fluorescence Image Device Performance Using Working Standards Calibrated With SI Units

Recently, fluorescence imaging using shortwave infrared light (SWIR, 1,000-2,000 nm) has been proposed as having advantage over conventional near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging due to the reduced tissue scattering, negligible autofluorescence, comparable tissue absorption, and the discovery that indocyanine green (ICG), used clinically as a NIRF contrast agent, also has fluorescence emission in SWIR regime. Images of ICG in small animals acquired by commercial Si-based and InGaAs-based imaging cameras have been qualitatively compared, however the lack of working standards to quantify performance of these imaging systems limits quantitative comparison. Without quantification using a traceable in vitro test, clinical adoption of rapidly evolving advances in both NIRF and SWIR imaging devices will become limited. In this work, we developed an ICG based fluorescent solid working standard calibrated with SI units (mW [Formula: see text]cm [Formula: see text]sr ^-1) for quantification of measurement sensitivity of Si, GaAs-intensified Si, and InGaAs based camera systems, their signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast in non-clinical tests. In addition, we present small animal and large animal imaging with ICG for qualitative comparison of the same SWIR fluorescence and NIRF imaging systems. Results suggest that SWIR fluorescence imaging of ICG may have superior resolution in small animal imaging compared to NIRF imaging, but lack of measurement sensitivity, SNR, contrast, as well as water absorption limits deep penetration in large animals.