Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors
Published on: January 3, 2017
An N-of-1 Randomized Controlled Trial of Interventions for Children With Inconsistent Speech Sound Errors
Susan Rvachew1, Tanya Matthews1
1School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Children with motor planning deficits improved with auditory-motor integration (AMI) therapy, while those with phonological planning deficits benefited more from phonological memory and planning (PMP) therapy. This shows underlying deficits predict speech intervention success.
Area of Science:
- Speech-language pathology
- Child language acquisition
- Neurodevelopmental disorders
Background:
- Children with inconsistent speech errors often have underlying motor planning or phonological planning deficits.
- Tailoring interventions to specific deficits can optimize treatment outcomes.
- Previous research suggests different therapeutic approaches may be more effective for distinct underlying impairments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test if children with inconsistent speech errors respond differently to specific interventions based on their primary impairment.
- To investigate if auditory-motor integration (AMI) is superior for motor planning deficits.
- To determine if phonological memory and planning (PMP) is superior for phonological planning deficits.
Main Methods:
- An N-of-1 randomized controlled trial involving 12 children with diagnosed motor planning (n=7) or phonological planning (n=5) deficits.
- Each child received three interventions: AMI, PMP, and a control (CTL) condition, in a randomized order over 6 weeks.
- Interventions targeted acoustic-phonetic knowledge and feedback integration (AMI) or segmenting and recompiling phonological plans (PMP).
Main Results:
- Children with motor planning deficits showed significant benefits from AMI compared to PMP for both same-day (p=2.01E-04) and next-day (p=2.97E-03) probes.
- Children with phonological planning deficits demonstrated significant benefits from PMP compared to AMI for both same-day (p=1.22E-02) and next-day (p=1.32E-02) probes.
- Response to the CTL intervention varied within both diagnostic groups.
Conclusions:
- The child's underlying psycholinguistic deficit significantly predicts their response to specific speech interventions.
- Auditory-motor integration (AMI) therapy is more effective for children with motor planning deficits.
- Phonological memory and planning (PMP) therapy is more effective for children with phonological planning deficits.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
08:32Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors
08:36The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Random Error
09:38Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:05Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)
Trial and Error and Algorithm

