Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026
Basic Life Support II: Airway/Breathing & Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Published on: April 30, 2023
Certified Basic Life Support Instructors Identify Improper Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills Poorly: Instructor
Camilla Hansen1, Camilla Bang, Mathilde Stærk
1From the Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus (C.H., C.B., M.S., B.L.); Department of Internal Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers (C.H., C.B., M.S., B.L.), and Clinical Research Unit, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers (C.H., C.B., M.S.); Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital (K.K.); Centre for Health Sciences Education, Aarhus University, Aarhus, (K.K.), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus (B.L.), and Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (B.L.).
Introduction:
During basic life support (BLS) training, instructors assess learners' cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills and correct errors to ensure high-quality performance. This study aimed to investigate certified BLS instructors' assessments of CPR skills.
Methods:
Data were collected at BLS courses for medical students at Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. Two certified BLS instructors evaluated each learner with a cardiac arrest test scenario, where learners demonstrated CPR on a resuscitation manikin for 3.5 minutes. Instructors' assessments were compared with manikin data as reference for correct performance. The first 3 CPR cycles were analyzed. Correct chest compressions were defined as 2 or more of 3 CPR cycles with 30 ± 2 chest compressions, 50 to 60 mm depth, and 100 to 120 min rate. Correct rescue breaths were defined as 50% or more efficient breaths with visible, but not excessive manikin chest inflation (for instructors) or 500 to 600mL air (manikin data).
Results:
Overall, 90 CPR assessments were performed by 16 instructor pairs. Instructors passed 81 (90%) learners, whereas manikin pass rate was 2%. Instructors identified correct chest compressions with a sensitivity of 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.79-1) and a specificity of 0.05 (95% CI = 0.01-0.14), as well as correct rescue breaths with a sensitivity of 1 (95% CI = 0.40-1) and a specificity of 0.07 (95% CI = 0.03-0.15). Instructors mistakenly failed 1 learner with adequate chest compression depth, while passing 53 (59%) learners with improper depth. Moreover, 80 (89%) improper rescue breath performances were not identified.
Conclusions:
Certified BLS instructors assess CPR skills poorly. Particularly, improper chest compression depth and rescue breaths are not identified.
Related Concept Videos
Basic Life Support Part II: Airway/Breathing and Continued Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation are the most important interventions for patients with cardiac arrest, and should be the first steps that rescuers perform. This is reflected in the American Heart Association's new "CAB" mnemonic. While rescuers were once taught the "ABCs" of cardiac arrest, they now learn "CAB" -...
Basic Life Support: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Defibrillation
High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is the single most important determinant of intact survival in cardiac arrest, and it is critical that all healthcare workers are able to perform this lifesaving technique effectively. Despite the conceptual simplicity of CPR, the reality is that many providers perform it incorrectly, resulting in suboptimal...
06:04Ultrasonographic Assessment During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
09:47A Rat Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Resuscitation by Conventional Closed-chest Technique
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
10:25Normothermic Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Mouse Model of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury
