Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Using fMRI to Dissect Moral Judgment09:20

Using fMRI to Dissect Moral Judgment

12.5K
Source: William Brady & Jay Van Bavel—New York University
In examining the roles of reason and emotion in moral judgments, psychologists and philosophers alike point to the trolley dilemma and the footbridge dilemma. With the trolley dilemma, most people say that it is appropriate to pull a switch to stop a train from hitting five people by diverting it to kill one person. However, with the footbridge dilemma, most people say it is inappropriate to push a large man off of a bridge in...
12.5K
Common Ion Effect03:24

Common Ion Effect

46.0K
Compared with pure water, the solubility of an ionic compound is less in aqueous solutions containing a common ion (one also produced by dissolution of the ionic compound). This is an example of a phenomenon known as the common ion effect, which is a consequence of the law of mass action that may be explained using Le Châtelier’s principle. Consider the dissolution of silver iodide:
46.0K
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development01:19

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

863
Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
863
Moral Hazard01:19

Moral Hazard

302
Moral hazards arise due to information asymmetry between buyers and sellers in a market. This occurs when one party cannot monitor the actions of the other. The emphasis on actions is important because moral hazard specifically results from the behavior of the party whose actions are not fully observable. In such situations, the party whose actions are not entirely observable may act less cautiously than they otherwise would, knowing their actions are only partially observed. This leaves...
302
Moral Hazard in the Market for Insurance01:27

Moral Hazard in the Market for Insurance

350
A moral hazard occurs when a party in a transaction neglects their responsibilities because they know that the other party will bear the financial consequences. This arises due to information asymmetry, as one party cannot observe the behavior of the other party after the transaction has taken place. Moral hazard is a typical problem in the insurance market. Its potential consequences can be detrimental to the market.For instance, consider a buyer who purchases a comprehensive health...
350
Mitigating Moral Hazard01:16

Mitigating Moral Hazard

271
Moral hazard refers to the situation where individuals or entities take greater risks because they do not bear the full consequences of their actions. Reducing moral hazard requires strategies that limit risk exposure and promote responsible behavior.For example, a common way to reduce moral hazard in commercial property insurance is by requiring safety measures. This includes fire alarms, sprinkler systems, and working smoke detectors. These devices help to prevent fires or reduce their...
271

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does Public Engagement Have a Role in Biomedical Clinical Research?

Bioethics·2026
Same author

Re-Constructing Medical Ethics.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

The Reality and Morality of Organ Allocation Policy: It's Complicated.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

Results From A Novel Surgical Ethics Curriculum for General Surgery Residents.

Journal of surgical education·2025
Same author

Research ethics education needs assessment in Serbian medical researchers.

Ethics & behavior·2025
Same author

Fogarty-Funded Research Ethics Training Programs in Eastern Europe.

Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE·2025
Same journal

Assisted dying and autonomy as an end in itself: a response to Donaldson.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Using fMRI to Dissect Moral Judgment
09:20

Using fMRI to Dissect Moral Judgment

Published on: April 30, 2023

12.5K

Why not common morality?

Rosamond Rhodes1

  • 1Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA Rosamond.Rhodes@mssm.edu.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|September 13, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Common morality accounts inadequately guide medical ethics. This study argues for a distinct medical ethics theory, essential for professional decision-making and defining medical professionalism.

Keywords:
common moralitymedical ethicsprinciplismprofessionalism

More Related Videos

Moral Hazard
01:19

Moral Hazard

Published on: March 27, 2025

302
Moral Hazard in the Market for Insurance
01:27

Moral Hazard in the Market for Insurance

Published on: March 27, 2025

350

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Using fMRI to Dissect Moral Judgment
09:20

Using fMRI to Dissect Moral Judgment

Published on: April 30, 2023

12.5K
Moral Hazard
01:19

Moral Hazard

Published on: March 27, 2025

302
Moral Hazard in the Market for Insurance
01:27

Moral Hazard in the Market for Insurance

Published on: March 27, 2025

350

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Philosophy of Medicine
  • Professional Ethics

Background:

  • Leading accounts of medical ethics equate it to applied common morality.
  • Existing frameworks like Beauchamp and Childress's four-principle account and Gert et al.'s 10-rule version are questioned.
  • The high-tech nature of modern medicine may necessitate a distinct ethical framework.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the sufficiency of common morality in guiding medical ethics.
  • To argue for the distinct nature of medical ethics separate from everyday ethics.
  • To propose the need for a new theoretical foundation for medical ethics.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of leading common morality accounts in medical ethics.
  • Illustrative examples to demonstrate the inadequacy of current frameworks.
  • Exploration of fundamental concepts: profession, role, and professionalism.

Main Results:

  • Common morality accounts, including Beauchamp and Childress's and Gert et al.'s, are insufficient guides for physicians.
  • Medical ethics is demonstrably distinct from and not derivable from everyday ethics.
  • Existing theories fail to adequately address the nuances of medical professionalism.

Conclusions:

  • A new theory of medical ethics is required, moving beyond common morality.
  • Medical professionals need a unique ethical touchstone for decision-making.
  • Clarification of 'profession' and its relation to medical ethics and professionalism is crucial.