Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Generation of CAR T Cells for Adoptive Therapy in the Context of Glioblastoma Standard of Care
Published on: February 16, 2015
[Difficulties and prospects in the immunotherapy of gliomas]
László Mangel1, József Najbauer2, Béla Kajtár3
1Onkoterápiás Intézet, Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Általános Orvostudományi Kar, Klinikai Központ, Pécs, Hungary. mangel.laszlo@pte.hu.
Despite the spectacular development of clinical immunotherapy (IT) in the last decade, the regular treatment approaches for the most common central nervous system (CNS) tumors, the malignant gliomas (MGs) has not changed yet. The most important pitfalls of the routine application of immunotherapy can be imputed to the special and originally immunosuppressed microenvironment and the extreme heterogeneity of MGs, however the defensive role of the blood-brain barrier, the general usage of steroids and the difficulties in the evaluation of brain images can also play a role in these types of difficulties. Additionally, in the case of MGs, well-accepted IT biomarker assays (PDL1 positivity, mismatch repair deficiencies, tumor mutation burden, etc.) generally reveal only minimal levels of immunogen activities. Nevertheless, there are some promising results with the utilization of checkpoint inhibitors and other IT modalities (such as virus-based therapies, tumor vaccines, adoptive T cell therapies) and with the combination of conventional oncotherapy methods in case of CNS malignancies, as well. In conclusion, although the CNS is not any more considered as an "immunological sanctuary" and despite some encouraging experimental and clinical results in CNS oncotherapy, the routine application of IT in case of MGs is still awaited.
Despite the spectacular development of clinical immunotherapy (IT) in the last decade, the regular treatment approaches for the most common central nervous system (CNS) tumors, the malignant gliomas (MGs) has not changed yet. The most important pitfalls of the routine application of immunotherapy can be imputed to the special and originally immunosuppressed microenvironment and the extreme heterogeneity of MGs, however the defensive role of the blood-brain barrier, the general usage of steroids and the difficulties in the evaluation of brain images can also play a role in these types of difficulties. Additionally, in the case of MGs, well-accepted IT biomarker assays (PDL1 positivity, mismatch repair deficiencies, tumor mutation burden, etc.) generally reveal only minimal levels of immunogen activities. Nevertheless, there are some promising results with the utilization of checkpoint inhibitors and other IT modalities (such as virus-based therapies, tumor vaccines, adoptive T cell therapies) and with the combination of conventional oncotherapy methods in case of CNS malignancies, as well. In conclusion, although the CNS is not any more considered as an "immunological sanctuary" and despite some encouraging experimental and clinical results in CNS oncotherapy, the routine application of IT in case of MGs is still awaited.
More Related Videos
12:52Isolation and Flow Cytometric Analysis of Glioma-infiltrating Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells
Published on: November 28, 2015
11:15Stereotactic Adoptive Transfer of Cytotoxic Immune Cells in Murine Models of Orthotopic Human Glioblastoma Multiforme Xenografts
Published on: September 1, 2018