Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

08:45
Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
Published on: October 24, 2012
15.2K
EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory
Eren Günseli1,2, Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort3,4, Dirk van Moorselaar3,4
1Columbia University, Department of Psychology, New York, USA. Gunseli.eren@gmail.com.
Scientific Reports
|September 20, 2019
Summary
Selective attention prioritizes working memory (WM) items. This study shows that storing information and attending to it in WM are distinct processes, with unattended items sometimes lost even when attention is later redirected.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Psychology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Selective attention is crucial for prioritizing information in working memory (WM), enhancing performance for attended items.
- The fate of unattended representations within WM, specifically whether they undergo information loss, remains an open question.
- Understanding the interplay between attention and storage is key to elucidating WM mechanisms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the hypothesis that selective attention and storage are independent mechanisms within working memory.
- To investigate whether unattended WM representations are subject to information loss.
- To examine how varying cue reliability influences attention allocation and information storage in WM.
Main Methods:
- Participants performed a working memory recall task while electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded.
- A retrospective cue was presented during the retention interval to indicate the likely item to be tested, with manipulated reliability.
- Contralateral delay activity (CDA) and contralateral alpha power suppression were used to measure storage and attention, respectively.
Main Results:
- Following highly reliable cues, attended items were prioritized, and non-cued items experienced information loss.
- With less reliable cues, unattended items were initially retained but later showed information loss, even when attention was reallocated.
- These findings indicate that storage and attention in WM are dissociable processes.
Conclusions:
- Selective attention and storage in working memory operate as distinct mechanisms.
- Information loss in unattended WM representations can occur, influenced by cue reliability and attention reallocation dynamics.
- The relative importance of representations dynamically modulates the interaction between attention and storage in working memory.

