Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Impact of Hierarchy on Multidisciplinary Heart-Team Recommendations in Patients with Isolated Multivessel Coronary
Mohamed Abdulrahman1, Alaa Alsabbagh2, Thomas Kuntze3
1Division of Cardiology, Zentralklinik, Bad Berka 99437, Germany. kal@zentralklinik.de.
Insights
Physician hierarchy significantly influences Heart Team (HT) decisions for multivessel coronary disease (MVD) treatment, impacting recommendations between coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This hierarchy effect persisted over time.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Heart Team (HT) discussions are guideline-recommended for optimizing myocardial revascularization in multivessel coronary disease (MVD).
- The impact of physician hierarchy on HT treatment recommendations remains unexamined in existing literature.
- This study investigates how the presence of surgical and cardiology leadership affects HT decisions for MVD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the influence of the presence of the Head of Cardiovascular Surgery (HOS) and Head of Cardiology (HOC) on Heart Team (HT) recommendations.
- To compare treatment choices (coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention) based on leadership attendance in HT meetings.
- To assess if hierarchical influence on MVD treatment decisions changes over time.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 209 Heart Team (HT) discussions for isolated multivessel coronary disease (MVD) between 2012 and 2015.
- Categorization of HT meetings based on the attendance of the Head of Cardiovascular Surgery (HOS) and Head of Cardiology (HOC): both present, neither present, or only one present.
- Comparison of recommended treatments (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG] vs. percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) across these attendance categories.
Main Results:
- When neither HOS nor HOC was present, recommendations were 69% CABG and 31% PCI.
- With both HOS and HOC present, recommendations were 77% CABG and 23% PCI (p=0.34).
- Significant differences emerged when only one leader was present: 83% CABG/17% PCI (HOS only) vs. 54% CABG/46% PCI (HOC only) (p<0.0001).
Conclusions:
- Physician hierarchy within the Heart Team (HT) significantly impacts treatment recommendations for multivessel coronary disease (MVD).
- The presence of cardiology leadership (HOC) strongly influences the shift towards percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to surgery.
- This hierarchical influence on HT decisions for MVD did not diminish over the study period.
Abstract:
Background: The Heart Team (HT) discussion has been incorporated in the current guidelines for myocardial revascularization in order to optimize treatment decisions for patients with multivessel coronary disease (MVD). There are no data in the literature, whether hierarchical issues do have an impact on HT decisions. We aimed to analyze the therapeutic recommendations of the multidisciplinary "Heart Team" (HT) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) if: (a) The head of cardiovascular surgery (HOS) and the head of cardiology (HOC) were present during the HT meeting, (b) both directors were absent, (c) only HOS or HOC was present. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all HT discussions between 2012 and 2015 in patients with isolated MVD (without any other cardiac problems requiring surgery). Results: During the study period, we analyzed 209 HT discussions in patients with isolated MVD. If neither HOS nor HOC was present at the HT discussion, the therapeutic recommendation was in 69% CABG and 31% PCI. If HOS and HOC were present in 77% CABG and 23% PCI was recommended (p = 0.34). If only HOS was present therapeutic recommendation was in 83% CABG and 17% PCI, and if only HOC was present the recommendation was in 54% CABG and 46% PCI (p < 0.0001). This difference did not attenuate during the study period. Conclusions: The hierarchy of the participating physicians significantly impacts treatment recommendations of a multidisciplinary HT in patients with isolated MVD. This impact did not attenuate after several years of Heart Team interaction.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures

