Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
Published on: January 29, 2020
Deficits in Explicit Language Problem Solving Rather Than in Implicit Learning in Specific Language Impairment:
Sara Ferman1, Liat Kishon-Rabin1, Hila Ganot-Budaga1
1Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Department of Communication Disorders, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Children with specific language impairment (SLI) struggled with explicit rule learning but mastered implicit aspects of an artificial morphological rule (AMR). This suggests language learning difficulties in SLI stem from explicit knowledge deficits, not just procedural memory issues.
Area of Science:
- Linguistics
- Developmental Psychology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Children with specific language impairment (SLI) often exhibit difficulties in language acquisition.
- Understanding the specific learning mechanisms underlying SLI is crucial for targeted interventions.
- Previous research suggests potential deficits in procedural memory in SLI, but the precise nature of these difficulties remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how children with SLI learn and master an artificial morphological rule (AMR) compared to typical age-matched (TAM) and typical younger (TY) children.
- To differentiate the learning capabilities of children with SLI in implicit versus explicit language rule acquisition.
- To explore the underlying cognitive mechanisms contributing to language learning challenges in SLI.
Main Methods:
- Twenty-six children (8 with SLI, 8 TAM, 10 TY) were trained on an AMR requiring phonological verb changes based on noun animacy.
- Participants engaged in judgment and production tasks involving repeated and novel (generalization) items.
- Performance was assessed across multiple training sessions to evaluate learning and mastery.
Main Results:
- Children with SLI showed less benefit from practice than TAM and TY peers in learning most aspects of the AMR.
- Despite baseline disadvantages, SLI children mastered task-specific phonological regularities at a rate comparable to their peers.
- Only half of the SLI group successfully generalized the AMR to new items, similar to 8-year-old TY children.
Conclusions:
- Children with SLI can learn language aspects relying on implicit, procedural learning.
- Difficulties arise in learning explicit aspects of language, such as uncovering the semantic principle of the AMR.
- Language learning challenges in SLI may be better explained by deficits in recruiting problem-solving abilities and establishing explicit knowledge, rather than a broad procedural memory impairment.
Related Concept Videos
Language and Cognition
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Language
Corballis and Suddendorf (2007) and Tomasello and Rakoczy (2003) highlight the role of language in...

