Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Reduction in Left Ventricular Wall Stress and Improvement in Function in Failing Hearts using Algisyl-LVR
Published on: April 8, 2013
Recovery of left ventricular dysfunction after sacubitril/valsartan: predictors and management
Hung-Yu Chang1, Kuan-Chun Chen2, Man-Cai Fong3
1Heart Center, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Insights
Sacubitril/valsartan treatment can improve heart failure outcomes, with recovery linked to non-ischemic causes and higher initial drug dosage. Maintaining the sacubitril/valsartan dose is crucial for sustained left ventricular function improvement.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Literature on left ventricular (LV) function recovery post sacubitril/valsartan and optimal heart failure (HF) management is limited.
- Understanding predictors of LV function recovery and the impact of dosage adjustments is essential for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate factors associated with left ventricular (LV) function recovery in chronic heart failure (HF) patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan.
- To evaluate the impact of sacubitril/valsartan dosage maintenance versus tapering on LV function and clinical outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 437 chronic HF patients with LVEF < 40% treated with sacubitril/valsartan.
- Echocardiographic measurements to assess LVEF recovery and multivariate analysis to identify predictive factors.
Main Results:
- 17.6% of patients achieved LVEF recovery (≥50%), associated with non-ischemic HF etiology, smaller baseline LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and higher initial sacubitril/valsartan dosage.
- LVEF recovery significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization (HR 0.42, p=0.014).
- Maintaining sacubitril/valsartan dosage preserved LVEF and reduced CVD/HFH events compared to tapering (5.9% vs 23.1%, HR 0.22, p=0.035).
Conclusions:
- Non-ischemic HF etiology, smaller baseline LVEDD, and higher initial sacubitril/valsartan dosage predict better LV function recovery.
- Tapering sacubitril/valsartan in patients with recovered LV function is linked to functional deterioration and poorer prognosis.
Background:
Literature describing recovery of left ventricular (LV) function post sacubitril/valsartan treatment and the optimal management of heart failure (HF) patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan remain sparse.
Methods:
We recruited 437 consecutive chronic HF patients with baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 40%, who were treated with sacubitril/valsartan. All patients underwent routine echocardiographic measurement.
Results:
During treatment period, recovery of LVEF to 50% or greater was observed in 77 (17.6%) patients. After multivariate analysis, recovery of LV dysfunction was associated with non-ischemic etiology of HF, smaller baseline LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and higher initial dosage of sacubitril/valsartan. Compared to those without recovery of LV dysfunction, death from cardiovascular causes or first unplanned hospitalization for HF (CVD/HFH) were significantly lower in patients with LVEF recovery [11.7% vs. 24.4%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.42, p = 0.014]. Among patients with recovery of LVEF, 51 patients continued to receive the same dosage of sacubitril/valsartan had higher LVEF and were less likely to have deterioration of LVEF than the other 26 patients who received either tapering dose of sacubitril/valsartan or switching from sacubitril/valsartan to renin-angiotensin-system blockers (LVEF 56.4 ± 5.3% vs. 45.0 ± 12.8%, p < 0.001; ΔLVEF 1.2 ± 5.1% vs. -9.3 ± 12.0%, p < 0.001). CVD/HFH occurred more frequently in the taper group than the maintenance group (23.1% vs. 5.9%, HR 0.22, p = 0.035).
Conclusions:
Non-ischemic etiology of HF, smaller baseline LVEDD, and higher initial dosage of sacubitril/valsartan could predict better recovery of LV function. Among patients with functional recovery, tapering sacubitril/valsartan dose was associated with deterioration of recovered heart function and had less favorable prognosis during follow-up.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

