Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

10:20
Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter
Published on: March 12, 2013
13.9K
Linking spatial patterns of terrestrial herbivore community structure to trophic interactions
Jakub Witold Bubnicki1, Marcin Churski1, Krzysztof Schmidt1
1Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża, Poland.
Elife
|October 3, 2019
Summary
Large herbivores shape ecosystems by influencing vegetation. Their distribution is driven by complex interactions between environmental factors, predator-prey dynamics, and human impacts, creating distinct herbivory regimes.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Landscape Ecology
- Wildlife Ecology
Background:
- Large herbivores significantly impact ecosystem functioning, primarily through vegetation modification across various spatial scales.
- The spatial distribution patterns of large herbivore communities are often determined by a complex interplay of top-down (biotic) and bottom-up (abiotic) ecological factors.
- Understanding these interactions is crucial for comprehending landscape-scale variations in community structure and ecosystem processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the intricate cascading interactions influencing the spatial distribution of large herbivore communities.
- To identify and characterize distinct landscape-scale herbivory regimes ('herbiscapes') within a forest ecosystem.
- To determine the relative importance of bottom-up, top-down, and human-induced factors on herbivore spatial dynamics.
Main Methods:
- Utilized high-resolution camera trapping to gather detailed data on herbivore presence and activity.
- Employed remote sensing techniques to analyze landscape-level environmental variables and vegetation structure.
- Integrated camera trapping and remote sensing data to model species-specific responses and community distribution patterns.
Main Results:
- The spatial distribution of the entire large herbivore community was significantly explained by species-specific responses to interacting bottom-up (environmental) and top-down (biotic) factors.
- Human-induced effects were identified as significant cascading factors influencing herbivore spatial distribution.
- Distinct landscape-scale herbivory regimes ('herbiscapes') were identified, characterized by unique combinations of herbivore community structure and environmental conditions.
Conclusions:
- The spatial distribution of large herbivores is a product of complex, interacting ecological gradients and human influences.
- The identified 'herbiscapes' represent a novel framework for understanding spatial variation in herbivory and its role in maintaining vegetation heterogeneity.
- These findings have implications for predicting herbivore dynamics and managing ecosystems in diverse environments.
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
20.9K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
20.9K
Symbiosis
36.8K
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
36.8K
Optimal Foraging
13.4K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
13.4K
Trophic Levels
37.1K
All organisms in an ecosystem occupy a trophic level in the food chain. The lowest level consists of primary producers, which synthesize their food from either solar or chemical energy. Each subsequent level obtains energy from the levels below. Detritivores can occupy any of the levels above primary producers.
37.1K
Trophic Efficiency
24.9K
Trophic level transfer efficiency (TLTE) is a measure of the total energy transfer from one trophic level to the next. Due to extensive energy loss as metabolic heat, an average of only 10% of the original energy obtained is passed on to the next level. This pattern of energy loss severely limits the possible number of trophic levels in a food chain.
24.9K
Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores
16.5K
Plants often form mutualistic relationships with soil-dwelling fungi or bacteria to enhance their roots’ nutrient uptake ability. Root-colonizing fungi (e.g., mycorrhizae) increase a plant’s root surface area, which promotes nutrient absorption. While root-colonizing, nitrogen-fixing bacteria (e.g., rhizobia) convert atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into ammonia (NH3), making nitrogen available to plants for various biological functions. For example, nitrogen is essential for the...
16.5K

