Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Fabrication and Application of Rose Bengal-chitosan Films in Laser Tissue Repair
Published on: October 23, 2012
Comparison of Photochemical Crosslinking Versus Sutures for Bonding Conjunctival Grafts
Yan Wang1, Lu Zhu1, Jingyin Zhu1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Background And Objectives:
To explore whether Rose Bengal-induced photochemical crosslinking (RB-PCL) can be a replacement for sutures in conjunctival autograft bonding, we compared the safety, operating time, postoperative ocular signs, and inflammatory responses of RB-PCL versus nylon suturing for sealing conjunctival autografts in rabbits.
Study Design/Materials And Methods:
Thirty-six New Zealand White rabbits underwent limbal conjunctival autografting using either sutures or RB-PCL to attach conjunctival autografts to the bare sclera. Animals were randomized to one of two groups (18 per group): the suture group or RB-PCL group. Photochemical crosslinking with a wavelength of 532 nm green light with an illumination intensity of 0.6 W/cm2 for 250 seconds (150 J/cm2 ) or suturing was performed followed by light examination at 3, 7, 28 days after surgery to evaluate the healing condition. Rabbits in each group were euthanized on day 3 (n = 6), 7 (n = 6), or 28 (n = 6) postoperatively, and the graft tissues from the surgical site were processed to evaluate inflammatory response by assessing protein levels of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) as well as histological examination. Cell viability was evaluated by counting both total and dead cells on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained tissue samples from both groups at 3 and 7 days after surgery. The surgery procedure time was recorded and the graft surface temperatures were measured before and after illumination.
Results:
Photochemical crosslinking effectively secured the limbal conjunctival autograft over an ocular conjunctival defect with no significant difference from the suture group. The time required for this light activated bonding method was ~550 seconds in comparison with the suture method of half hour. The differences of measured temperature on the graft surface before and after RB-PCL treatment were 2.98 ± 0.11°C. The induction of IL-6 and TNF-α protein was remarkably reduced in the RB-PCL group compared with the suture group at 3 and 7 days after surgery. Histology revealed less infiltrated neutrophils were observed in the RB-PCL group than in the suture group at 3 and 7 days postoperatively. Furthermore, the RB-PCL group showed a better healing process with less eye discharge and mild conjunctival congestion. No significant difference in percent dead cells was observed between RB-PCL and suture groups at 3 and 7 days after surgery.
Conclusions:
RB-PCL is a promising alternative for bonding the conjunctival autograft with shorter operation time, less inflammation and better healing outcomes compared to conventional suture. Thermal damage and phototoxicity were not observed using the RB-PCL method in bonding conjunctival grafts. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
More Related Videos
12:25Second Harmonic Generation Signals in Rabbit Sclera As a Tool for Evaluation of Therapeutic Tissue Cross-linking TXL for Myopia
Published on: January 6, 2018
07:29Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis
Published on: November 12, 2015