Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Remote Laboratory Management: Respiratory Virus Diagnostics
Published on: April 6, 2019
Influencing Factors in the Development of State-Level Movement Restriction and Monitoring Policies in Response to
Tara Kirk Sell1, Matthew P Shearer1, Diane Meyer1
1Tara Kirk Sell, PhD, MA, is a Senior Scholar and Assistant Professor; Matthew P. Shearer, MPH, is a Senior Analyst and Research Associate; and Diane Meyer, RN, MPH, is Managing Senior Analyst and Research Associate; all at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract:
During the 2014-15 domestic Ebola response, US states developed monitoring and movement restriction policies for potentially exposed individuals. We describe decision-making processes and factors in the development of these policies. Results may help health officials anticipate potential concerns and policy influencers in future infectious disease responses. Thirty individuals with knowledge of state-level Ebola policy development participated in semi-structured interviews conducted from January to May 2017. Interviewees represented 18 jurisdictions from diverse census regions, state political affiliations, and public health governance structures as well as the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Limited and/or changing guidance and unique state-level public health, legal, and operational environments resulted in variation in policy responses. Federal guidance developed by the CDC was an important information source influencing state-level policy responses, as was available scientific evidence; however, other external factors, such as local events, contributing experts, political environment, public concern, news media, and the influence of neighboring states, contributed to additional variation. Improvements in timing, consistency, and communication of federal guidance for monitoring and movement restrictions at the state level-along with balanced approaches to addressing ethical concerns, scientific evidence, and public concern at the state level-are considerations for policy development for future disease responses.
More Related Videos
10:11Modeling The Lifecycle Of Ebola Virus Under Biosafety Level 2 Conditions With Virus-like Particles Containing Tetracistronic Minigenomes
Published on: September 27, 2014
08:53Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 2. General Practices
Published on: October 3, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Cross-reactivity
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...