Do Hospital Rankings Mislead Patients? Variability Among National Rating Systems for Orthopaedic Surgery
Romil F Shah1, David W Manning, Bennet A Butler
1From the Department of Surgery (Dr. Shah, Dr. Bilimoria), Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, and Department of Orthopaedics (Dr. Shah, Dr. Manning, Dr. Butler), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Online hospital rating systems for orthopaedic surgery show little agreement. These conflicting ratings offer minimal guidance for patients, providers, and payers when choosing a hospital for orthopaedic care.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Orthopaedic Surgery Quality Assessment
Background:
- Multiple online hospital rating systems for orthopaedic surgery are available.
- Previous studies questioned the accuracy and consistency of these systems in other medical fields.
- No formal analysis of orthopaedic surgery rating systems had been conducted.
Purpose of the Study:
- To formally analyze the accuracy and consistency of online hospital rating systems for orthopaedic surgery.
- To assess the agreement and disagreement between different hospital rating systems.
- To identify hospital characteristics influencing ratings.
Main Methods:
- Examined five hospital rating systems (US News, HealthGrades, CareChex, Women's Choice, Hospital Compare) for orthopaedic surgery performance.
- Conducted descriptive analysis and assessed agreement/disagreement between ratings.
- Used Cohen's kappa and multinomial logistic regression to analyze agreement and influencing factors.
Main Results:
- No hospital was ranked as high-performing by all five systems; no hospital was ranked low-performing by all three systems that define low performance.
- Little agreement was found between any combination of rating systems regarding top-tier or bottom-tier performance (κ < 0.10).
- Hospitals were more likely to receive conflicting ratings (high-performing by one, low-performing by another) than consistent high-performance ratings.
Conclusions:
- There is a significant lack of agreement between hospital quality rating systems for orthopaedic surgery.
- Publicly available ratings provide conflicting information, offering little guidance for selecting orthopaedic surgery providers.
- Patients, providers, and payers receive inadequate guidance due to inconsistent hospital performance data.
Related Concept Videos
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Ordinal Level of Measurement
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...


