Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

09:15
In Vitro Thrombosis Test for Ventricular Assist Devices
Published on: March 21, 2025
1.1K
Calibrated Automated Thrombogram During Pregnancy in Unexplained Recurrent Miscarriages: A Pilot Study
Adi Elias1, Rudi Hamoudi2, Naama Schwartz3
1Department of Internal Medicine B, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
The Israel Medical Association Journal : IMAJ
|October 11, 2019
Summary
Calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) testing did not show significant differences in thrombin generation during early pregnancy for women with recurrent miscarriages. CAT parameters could not predict pregnancy outcomes in this patient group.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Medicine
- Hematology
- Thrombophilia Diagnostics
Background:
- Recurrent miscarriage is linked to a high incidence of thrombophilia.
- Calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) offers a universal method for thrombophilia screening.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess if thrombin generation, measured by CAT, is elevated in the first trimester of pregnancy for women experiencing unexplained recurrent miscarriages.
- To determine the predictive value of CAT parameters for pregnancy outcomes in this cohort.
Main Methods:
- The study included 25 pregnant women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss undergoing thrombophilia screening and treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH).
- Thrombin generation was analyzed using CAT in relation to miscarriage or live birth and thrombophilia status.
Main Results:
- Pregnancy outcomes included 76% live births and 24% miscarriages; 76% of women tested positive for thrombophilia.
- No significant differences in thrombin generation parameters were observed between pregnancies ending in miscarriage versus live birth.
- CAT parameters did not successfully predict pregnancy outcomes and showed only a non-significant trend toward hypercoagulability in thrombophilic women.
Conclusions:
- Thrombin generation in the first trimester was similar among women with unexplained pregnancy loss, irrespective of the pregnancy outcome.
- CAT parameters were ineffective in predicting pregnancy outcomes in women with recurrent unexplained pregnancy loss.
- Study findings should be considered preliminary due to the small sample size.

