Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 5, 2026

08:25
Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
Published on: April 11, 2018
15.8K
Provision of Organ at Risk Contouring Guidance in UK Radiotherapy Clinical Trials
1NIHR Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Summary
Inconsistent organ at risk (OAR) naming in radiotherapy trials necessitates standardized contouring guidance. This study identified nomenclature variations and led to developing consensus recommendations for OAR delineation in clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Radiotherapy Quality Assurance
- Clinical Trial Design
- Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
Background:
- Accurate delineation of organs at risk (OAR) is critical for effective radiotherapy planning and preventing unintended dose delivery to healthy tissues.
- Imprecise anatomical definitions in OAR contouring can lead to suboptimal treatment plans and potential harm to patients.
- The National Institute of Health Research Clinical Research Network (NIHR CRN) portfolio includes numerous clinical trials requiring OAR contouring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the existing provision of OAR contouring guidance within NIHR CRN portfolio clinical trials.
- To identify inconsistencies and variations in OAR nomenclature and delineation across radiotherapy clinical trials.
- To inform the development of standardized OAR contouring guidelines for clinical trials.
Main Methods:
- A two-round Delphi assessment was conducted by the National Radiotherapy Quality Trials Assurance (RTTQA) Group.
- The assessment aimed to identify OAR descriptions that provide optimal contouring guidance.
- Eighty-four clinical trials within the NIHR CRN portfolio involving radiotherapy quality assurance were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Fifty-nine of the 84 identified trials mandated OAR contouring.
- Significant nomenclature variation was observed for 159 out of 412 OARs, with notable inconsistencies for the femoral head ± neck, parotid gland, and bowel.
- The Delphi assessment identified 42 OAR descriptions as providing optimal contouring guidance.
Conclusions:
- A clear need exists for consistent OAR nomenclature and contouring guidance across radiotherapy clinical trials.
- The RTTQA Group is collaborating with international partners to develop consensus recommendations for OAR delineation.
- These efforts aim to improve the harmonization of radiation therapy clinical trials through standardized OAR contouring.

