Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging
Published on: April 18, 2025
The relevant range of scales for multi-scale contextual spatial modelling
Thorsten Behrens1,2, Raphael A Viscarra Rossel3, Ruth Kerry4
1Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Cluster of Excellence "Machine Learning: New Perspectives for Science", Maria von Linden Str. 6, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. thorsten.behrens@uni-tuebingen.de.
Abstract:
Spatial autocorrelation in the residuals of spatial environmental models can be due to missing covariate information. In many cases, this spatial autocorrelation can be accounted for by using covariates from multiple scales. Here, we propose a data-driven, objective and systematic method for deriving the relevant range of scales, with distinct upper and lower scale limits, for spatial modelling with machine learning and evaluated its effect on modelling accuracy. We also tested an approach that uses the variogram to see whether such an effective scale space can be approximated a priori and at smaller computational cost. Results showed that modelling with an effective scale space can improve spatial modelling with machine learning and that there is a strong correlation between properties of the variogram and the relevant range of scales. Hence, the variogram of a soil property can be used for a priori approximations of the effective scale space for contextual spatial modelling and is therefore an important analytical tool not only in geostatistics, but also for analyzing structural dependencies in contextual spatial modelling.
Related Concept Videos
Levels of Use of a GIS
Scaling
Range
15.9; 16.1; 15.2; 14.8; 15.8; 15.9; 16.0; 15.5
Measurements of the amount of soda in a 16-ounce can vary since different subjects record these measurements or since the exact amount - 16 ounces of liquid, was not...
Selected Data About Geographic Locations
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Midrange
Simply put, the midrange is half of the data set’s range. Similar to the mean, the midrange is sensitive to the extreme values and hence the prospective outliers. However, unlike the mean, the midrange is not sensitive to all the values of the data set that lie in the middle. Thus, it is prone to...

