Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Planning and analyzing clinical trials with competing risks: Recommendations for choosing appropriate statistical
J C Poythress1, Misun Yu Lee2, James Young2
1Department of Statistics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
Ignoring competing risks in time-to-event data analysis can bias results. Use Gray's test and appropriate models like cause-specific hazards (CSH) or Fine-Gray (F-G) with diagnostics for valid inference.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Survival Analysis
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Competing risks in time-to-event data arise when multiple event types can occur.
- Ignoring these risks leads to biased statistical inference for the event of interest.
- Accurate analysis requires methods that formally account for competing risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review bias mechanisms in competing risks analysis.
- To describe statistical methods for unbiased inference.
- To compare semiparametric models and diagnostic procedures.
Main Methods:
- Simulation studies to compare statistical tests and models.
- Review of bias mechanisms and interpretation of model estimates.
- Evaluation of model diagnostic methods for cause-specific hazards (CSH) and Fine-Gray (F-G) models.
Main Results:
- Gray's test is recommended over the logrank test for nonparametric hypothesis testing.
- Differences in estimates between CSH and F-G models are identified.
- Model fit diagnostics are crucial for valid statistical inference.
Conclusions:
- Proper accounting for competing risks is essential for accurate time-to-event data analysis.
- Analysts should use Gray's test and consider CSH/F-G models with diagnostics.
- Model diagnostics significantly impact the validity of statistical inference in competing risks settings.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials

