Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 5, 2026

07:07
Development of a Direct Pulp-capping Model for the Evaluation of Pulpal Wound Healing and Reparative Dentin Formation in Mice
Published on: January 12, 2017
11.7K
A Systematic Review of Pulp Revascularization Using a Triple Antibiotic Paste
Aline Maria do Couto1, Marcela Carvalho Espaladori2, Anamaria Pessoa Pereira Leite3
1Dr. do Couto, PhD candidate, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil;,
Pediatric Dentistry
|October 26, 2019
Summary
Triple antibiotic paste effectively treats immature teeth needing pulp revascularization. This therapy promotes symptom resolution and aids in periapical healing for successful outcomes in pediatric dentistry.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Regenerative Endodontics
- Pediatric Dentistry
Background:
- Pulp revascularization is a regenerative treatment for immature teeth with necrotic pulp.
- Triple antibiotic paste has been investigated for its efficacy in this procedure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review clinical and radiographic outcomes of pulp revascularization using triple antibiotic paste in immature teeth.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of this regenerative approach.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive electronic literature searches were performed across multiple databases.
- Eight clinical trials were included for qualitative analysis after screening 1,768 references.
- Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool.
Main Results:
- Included studies showed clinical and radiographic success in pulp revascularization.
- Triple antibiotic paste demonstrated effectiveness in resolving symptoms and achieving periapical healing.
- The risk of bias in the included studies varied from low to unclear.
Conclusions:
- Triple antibiotic paste is an effective option for pulp revascularization in immature teeth.
- The treatment leads to absence of symptoms and restoration of periapical integrity.
- Further research may be needed to clarify the risk of bias in existing studies.

