Elevated Lipoprotein(a) in Perinatally HIV-Infected Children Compared With Healthy Ethnicity-Matched Controls

Malon Van den Hof1, Mirthe J Klein Haneveld1, Charlotte Blokhuis1

  • 1Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Insights

Perinatally HIV-infected children on combination antiretroviral therapy show elevated Lipoprotein(a) levels, suggesting a potential increase in cardiovascular disease risk. Further research is needed to confirm this association.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Cardiology
  • Infectious Diseases

Background:

  • Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in perinatally HIV-infected (PHIV+) patients on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) is not well understood due to their young age.
  • Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a known independent causal risk factor for CVD in the general population, but its role in PHIV+ is less established.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare lipid profiles, specifically Lp(a) levels, between cART-treated PHIV+ children and age/sex-matched controls.
  • To investigate associations between Lp(a) levels and disease/treatment-related factors, biomarkers, and neuroimaging outcomes in PHIV+ children.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-sectional study comparing lipid profiles (including nonfasting Lp(a)) in 35 cART-treated PHIV+ children (8-18 years) and 37 controls.
  • Linear regression models were used to explore associations between Lp(a) and various clinical and biological factors.

Main Results:

  • PHIV+ children exhibited significantly higher Lp(a) levels compared to controls (43.6 vs 21.8 mg/dL; P = .033).
  • No significant differences were observed in other lipid levels, apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein CIII, apolipoprotein E, or APOE genotype.
  • Higher Lp(a) correlated with higher apoB and lower monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and triglyceride levels in PHIV+ children, but not with HIV/cART variables or neuroimaging outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • cART-treated PHIV+ children demonstrate elevated Lp(a) levels, potentially indicating an increased CVD risk.
  • Future studies should examine the relationship between Lp(a) and subclinical/clinical CVD measures in this population.
Abstract