Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Change in attachment level.

J C Gunsolley1, A M Best

  • 1Department of Periodontology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.

Journal of Periodontology
|July 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Accurate periodontal attachment level change detection is hindered by measurement error. Resampling simulations revealed that while Type I error rates are low, false-positive rates for detecting changes are high, impacting clinical assessment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Richard Ranney, a Visionary Academician.

Journal of dental research·2025
Same author

The OHStat guidelines for reporting observational studies and clinical trials in oral health research: manuscript checklist.

The Angle orthodontist·2024
Same author

The OHStat Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies and Clinical Trials in Oral Health Research: Manuscript Checklist.

Journal of endodontics·2024
Same author

The OHStat Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies and Clinical Trials in Oral Health Research: Manuscript Checklist.

Journal of dental research·2024
Same author

The OHStat Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies and Clinical Trials in Oral Health Research: Explanation and Elaboration.

JDR clinical and translational research·2024
Same author

Periodontal Effects of the Reversible Dipeptidyl Peptidase 1 Inhibitor Brensocatib in Bronchiectasis.

JDR clinical and translational research·2023
Same journal

Cardiovascular and anti-inflammatory effects of periodontal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Journal of periodontology·2026
Same journal

Impact of toothbrush type and periodontal phenotype on root coverage stability: A 6-year observational follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.

Journal of periodontology·2026
Same journal

Local immunoinflammatory profiles following treatment in primary and permanent dentitions in molar-incisor pattern periodontitis: One-year follow-up.

Journal of periodontology·2026
Same journal

An in vitro comparison of PDGF-BB release from composite graft materials containing leukocyte-rich platelet-rich fibrin and platelet-derived growth factor-BB and β-tricalcium phosphate.

Journal of periodontology·2026
Same journal

Periodontal inflamed surface area (PISA) system and components: Potential for exploring the periodontal systemic interface.

Journal of periodontology·2026
Same journal

Evaluating diagnostic precision in applying the 2017 periodontal disease framework: A Canadian study across training levels.

Journal of periodontology·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Periodontology
  • Dental diagnostics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Attachment level and pocket depth measurements are crucial for assessing periodontal attachment changes.
  • Measurement error in these assessments can limit their clinical utility and reliability.
  • Previous studies often assumed normal distribution of measurement errors, potentially affecting accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the normality assumption of attachment level measurements.
  • To estimate error rates in detecting periodontal attachment level changes using standard measurements.
  • To compare the effectiveness of different simulation methods in modeling measurement error.

Main Methods:

  • Two simulation methods were employed: one based on normal distribution and another using resampling.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The ability of each method to replicate the distribution of differences in replicate measurements was assessed.
  • Error rates, including Type I and false-positive rates, were calculated for detecting a 3-mm change in attachment level.

    • Main Results:

    • Simulations based on a normal distribution failed to accurately reproduce the distribution of differences in replicate measurements.
    • Resampling simulations successfully recreated the distribution of differences, indicating their suitability for error rate estimation.
    • While Type I error rates were low for both single (0.0074) and paired (0.0014) measurements for a 3-mm change, false-positive rates were high (0.32 for single measurements).

    Conclusions:

    • The assumption of normally distributed attachment level measurements is questionable.
    • Resampling simulations provide a more accurate method for modeling measurement error in periodontology.
    • High false-positive rates indicate a significant risk of overestimating periodontal attachment changes, necessitating careful interpretation of measurement data.