Outcomes of Macrolide Deescalation in Severe Community-acquired Pneumonia
Tiffany M Hopkins1, Paul Juang2, Katherine Weaver3
1Department of Pharmacy, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Purpose:
Current data suggest potential benefits with β-lactam plus macrolide combination therapy for empiric treatment of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, it is unclear whether deescalation to β-lactam monotherapy in the absence of positive results on diagnostic tests, such as the BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2 (BioFire polymerase chain reaction [PCR]), affects clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between patients with negative BioFire PCR results deescalated to β-lactam monotherapy with those not deescalated.
Methods:
This single-center, retrospective cohort study assessed the in-hospital mortality rates of critically ill adults with CAP treated for ≥48 h with combination β-lactam and azithromycin therapy. Additional end points included hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, duration of mechanical ventilatory support, 30-day readmission, and incidence of azithromycin-related adverse effects.
Findings:
A total of 94 patients were included: 53 in the deescalation group and 41 in the nondeescalation group. No difference was observed with respect to in-hospital mortality (2.4% vs 11.3%, P = 0.312), although patients in the deescalated group experienced shorter ICU (1.9 vs 3.4 days, P = 0.029) and hospital LOS (6 vs 7 days, P = 0.025). No differences were found between groups with respect to additional secondary end points. Simple logistic regression confirmed that deescalation was not associated with hospital mortality (odds ratio = 0.17, 95% CI, 0.02-1.70).
Implications:
In this study of ICU patients with severe CAP and a negative BioFire PCR result, deescalation from combination β-lactam and macrolide therapy to β-lactam monotherapy was not associated with increased in-hospital mortality but was associated with decreased hospital and ICU LOS. Larger prospective studies are warranted to verify these findings.
Insights
Deescalating antibiotic therapy for severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in ICU patients with negative BioFire PCR results did not increase mortality. This approach was linked to shorter hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) lengths of stay.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Critical Care Medicine
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Combination therapy with beta-lactam and macrolide antibiotics is often used for severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in intensive care units (ICUs).
- The impact of deescalating to beta-lactam monotherapy after negative diagnostic tests, like the BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2 (PCR), on patient outcomes remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical outcomes between ICU patients with severe CAP and negative BioFire PCR results who were deescalated to beta-lactam monotherapy versus those who were not.
Main Methods:
- A single-center, retrospective cohort study included critically ill adults with CAP receiving at least 48 hours of combination beta-lactam and azithromycin therapy.
- Outcomes assessed included in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, duration of mechanical ventilation, 30-day readmission, and azithromycin-related adverse events.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in in-hospital mortality was observed between the deescalation group (2.4%) and the nondeescalation group (11.3%).
- Patients who were deescalated experienced significantly shorter ICU LOS (1.9 vs. 3.4 days) and hospital LOS (6 vs. 7 days).
- Deescalation was not associated with increased hospital mortality in logistic regression analysis (OR = 0.17).
Conclusions:
- In ICU patients with severe CAP and negative BioFire PCR results, deescalation from combination therapy to beta-lactam monotherapy is safe regarding mortality.
- Deescalation was associated with reduced hospital and ICU length of stay.
- Larger prospective studies are recommended to confirm these findings.
More Related Videos
10:26P. aeruginosa Infected 3D Co-Culture of Bronchial Epithelial Cells and Macrophages at Air-Liquid Interface for Preclinical Evaluation of Anti-Infectives
Published on: June 15, 2020
07:46Use of Artificial Sputum Medium to Test Antibiotic Efficacy Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Conditions More Relevant to the Cystic Fibrosis Lung
Published on: June 5, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Pneumonia V: Nursing management and Prevention
The nurse must practice strict medical asepsis and adhere to infection control guidelines to minimize healthcare-associated infections.
Enhance airway patency
Position the patient correctly to facilitate drainage of the affected lung segments. Manual or mechanical percussion and vibration can also be employed....
COPD: Management Using Bronchodilators and Corticosteroids
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Pneumonia II: Pathophysiology
