Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Application of Straight-needle, Three-tailed, Knot-free, Peritoneal Sutures in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair
Published on: November 12, 2021
The Assessment of Complications After Major Abdominal Surgery: A Comparison of Two Scales
Jelena Veličković1, Chen Feng2, Ivan Palibrk1
1Intensive Care Unit, Clinical Center of Serbia, Clinic for Digestive Surgery, Belgrade, Serbia; School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Insights
The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) better captures postoperative morbidity in high-risk surgical patients than the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). CCI correlates more strongly with hospital length of stay, offering a more accurate assessment of surgical outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Surgical outcomes research
- Patient safety and quality improvement
- Clinical epidemiology
Background:
- Accurate assessment of postoperative morbidity is crucial for evaluating surgical outcomes.
- Current methods for reporting surgical complications lack consensus, with the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) focusing only on the most severe complication.
- The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) has been developed to quantify the overall burden of complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate and compare the efficacy of the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI).
- To assess these complication scoring systems in high-risk surgical patients where multiple complications are common.
- To determine the correlation of CDC and CCI with hospitalization indicators and functional recovery post-surgery.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, observational study involving 206 high-risk adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
- Postoperative complications were meticulously recorded until discharge or 30-day readmission.
- Complication severity was graded using the CDC, and the CCI was subsequently calculated for comparative analysis.
Main Results:
- A total of 424 complications were documented in 125 (60.7%) patients, with a median CCI of 20.9.
- Both CCI and CDC showed a strong correlation (r=0.969, P<0.01), but CCI demonstrated stronger associations with intensive care unit length of stay (LOS) and overall postoperative LOS.
- The CCI and highest CDC grade significantly differed concerning functional activity upon discharge (P<0.001).
Conclusions:
- Both the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) are effective for reporting complications after major abdominal surgery.
- The CCI provides a more accurate and comprehensive measure of morbidity in high-risk surgical patients.
- The CCI shows a superior correlation with postoperative length of stay, enhancing its utility in outcome assessment.
Background:
An accurate and reproducible method for the evaluation of postoperative morbidity is essential for a valid assessment of the outcomes of surgery. However, there is still no consensus on reporting of complications. The Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) of complications is a validated system which reports only the most severe complication. The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) is a novel scale designed to capture the overall burden of complications. The aim of our study is to validate and compare the CDC and the CCI in the setting of high-risk surgical patients in whom multiple complications are common.
Methods:
A prospective, observational study analyzed 206 high-risk adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Each postoperative complication was recorded until discharge or readmission within 30 days. The severity of complications was graded with the CDC, and the CCI was calculated subsequently. Correlations of the CDC and the CCI with hospitalization indicators and functional activity on discharge were assessed and compared.
Results:
A total of 424 complications occurred in 125 (60.7%) patients. The median CCI for the cohort was 20.9 (0-44.9). CD grade II was the most frequent among patients with complications (62/125; 49.6%). The CCI and the CDC have shown a strong correlation (r = 0.969, P < 0.01). Both scales strongly correlated with the parameters of hospitalization, but the CCI showed a stronger correlation to the intensive care unit length of stay (LOS; 0.670 versus 0.628, P < 0.001), postoperative LOS (0.652 versus 0.630, P = 0.041), and prolonged intensive care unit LOS (0.604 versus 0.555, P < 0.001). The median CCI and the highest CD grade were significantly different respective to the functional activity on discharge (P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
The CDC and the CCI are the effective methods for reporting of complications after major abdominal surgery. The CCI is a more accurate scale for use in high-risk patients and correlates better with the postoperative LOS.
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion
Percussion
Percussion is an essential...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....

