Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Determining Glucose Metabolism Kinetics Using 18F-FDG Micro-PET/CT
Published on: May 2, 2017
Does 2-FDG PET Accurately Reflect Quantitative In Vivo Glucose Utilization?
Jorge R Barrio1, Sung-Cheng Huang2, Nagichettiar Satyamurthy2
1Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California jbarrio@mednet.ucla.edu krohke@ohsu.edu.
The lumped constant (LC) for 2-deoxy-2-18F-fluoro-d-glucose (2-FDG) PET is not constant, impacting glucose metabolism measurements. New tracers like Me-4FDG may offer a more complete picture of glucose utilization.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear Medicine
- Biochemistry
- Oncology
Background:
- 2-Deoxy-2-18F-fluoro-d-glucose (2-FDG) PET is a widely used clinical tool for assessing glucose metabolism in various diseases.
- Quantitative analysis relies on the assumption of a constant lumped constant (LC), representing the proportionality between glucose and 2-FDG metabolism.
- However, 2-FDG primarily reflects glucose transport via facilitated-glucose transporters (GLUTs), potentially overlooking sodium-dependent glucose cotransporters (SGLTs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight potential limitations of 2-FDG PET in accurately quantifying in vivo glucose metabolism.
- To emphasize the variability of the lumped constant (LC) in different physiological and pathological conditions.
- To introduce the potential of novel tracers for a more comprehensive assessment of glucose transport.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on 2-FDG PET and glucose transporter mechanisms.
- Discussion of the implications of SGLT-mediated glucose transport on 2-FDG-based quantification.
- Introduction of α-methyl-4-deoxy-4-18F-fluoro-d-glucopyranoside (Me-4FDG) as a potential complementary tracer.
Main Results:
- The lumped constant (LC) is not fixed for a given tissue and can vary significantly, especially in tumors and during disease progression or treatment.
- 2-FDG PET may underestimate or inaccurately represent overall glucose utilization due to its limited interaction with SGLTs.
- Variability in LC can affect the accuracy of prognostic value and treatment monitoring using 2-FDG PET.
Conclusions:
- The assumption of a constant LC for 2-FDG PET may lead to inaccuracies in quantitative glucose metabolism assessment.
- The role of SGLTs in glucose transport necessitates consideration for a more complete understanding of in vivo energetics.
- Combined use of 2-FDG and Me-4FDG may provide a more comprehensive evaluation of glucose utilization through both GLUT and SGLT pathways.
More Related Videos
06:51Utilizing 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging and Quantitative Histology to Measure Dynamic Changes in the Glucose Metabolism in Mouse Models of Lung Cancer
Published on: July 21, 2018
09:03Radiotracer Administration for High Temporal Resolution Positron Emission Tomography of the Human Brain: Application to FDG-fPET
Published on: October 22, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...