Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

MRM Microcoil Performance Calibration and Usage Demonstrated on Medicago truncatula Roots at 22 T
Published on: January 16, 2021
Calibration, Conversion, and Quantitative Multi-Layer Inversion of Multi-Coil Rigid-Boom Electromagnetic Induction
Christian von Hebel1,2, Jan van der Kruk3,4, Johan A Huisman5,6
1Institute of Bio- and Geoscience, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany. c.von.hebel@fz-juelich.de.
This study enhances electromagnetic induction (EMI) data processing for accurate subsurface electrical conductivity mapping. Improved calibration and conversion methods yield reliable conductivity models, aiding environmental monitoring and remote sensing integration.
Area of Science:
- Geophysics
- Environmental Science
- Electrical Engineering
Background:
- Multi-coil electromagnetic induction (EMI) systems measure subsurface apparent electrical conductivity (σa).
- Traditional EMI data processing can be unreliable due to above-ground influences and signal alterations.
- Accurate electrical conductivity models are crucial for subsurface characterization and monitoring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an improved data processing workflow for multi-coil EMI data.
- To enhance the calibration, conversion, and inversion of EMI measurements for greater accuracy.
- To improve the reliability of subsurface electrical conductivity models derived from EMI data.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of three direct current resistivity techniques (Dipole-Dipole, Schlumberger, vertical electrical soundings) for EMI data calibration.
- Implementation of a non-linear exact EMI conversion method for magnetic field to σa conversion.
- Development of a complete processing workflow integrating calibration, conversion, and inversion.
Main Results:
- All three direct current resistivity methods provided robust calibration results for σa.
- Dipole-Dipole-based calibration demonstrated stability across different soil types.
- The proposed workflow yields accurate, quantitative EMI data and reliable intrinsic electrical conductivity estimates.
Conclusions:
- The enhanced EMI data processing workflow significantly improves the accuracy and reliability of subsurface electrical conductivity models.
- This advancement facilitates better integration of EMI data with other geophysical methods like remote sensing.
- The improved methodology supports more effective subsurface monitoring applications.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Instrument Calibration
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

