Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reply to Stigler, Nusbaum, and Chalip.

R Kail1

  • 1Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.

Child Development
|August 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Speed of processing in children with specific language impairment.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2001
Same author

Distinguishing short-term memory from working memory.

Memory & cognition·2001
Same author

Brief report: speed of information processing in children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Journal of pediatric psychology·2000
Same author

Speed of information processing in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·1998
Same author

Phonological skill and articulation time independently contribute to the development of memory span.

Journal of experimental child psychology·1997
Same author

Processing time, imagery, and spatial memory.

Journal of experimental child psychology·1997
Same journal

Timing and type of domestic violence exposure and adolescents' experiences of peer violence.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Comprehension of "can" predicts performance on a nonverbal measure of modal concepts at 48 but not 36 months.

Child development·2026
Same journal

An associative learning account of how saliva becomes a cue for comfort.

Child development·2026
Same journal

If moms do it, it can't be that important: Children's reasoning about gender disparities in domestic work.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Adapting under stress: How sociocultural stress intensity and fluctuation shape youth school engagement and internalizing symptoms.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Children across diverse societies exchange reasons to resolve disagreements.

Child development·2026
See all related articles

This study addresses criticisms of a 1986 article on cognitive development. It concludes that effective theories require both domain-specific and general cognitive processes.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • Critiques of a 1986 article on cognitive development theories have been raised by Stigler et al.
  • The debate centers on the interplay of domain-specific and general processes in cognitive development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To refute specific criticisms leveled against a 1986 article concerning cognitive development.
  • To assert the necessity of integrating both domain-specific and general processes in cognitive development theories.

Main Methods:

  • Re-evaluation of criticisms presented by Stigler et al.
  • Analysis of underlying assumptions in the critiques.
  • Theoretical argumentation based on existing cognitive development research.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Demonstration that many criticisms by Stigler et al. are factually incorrect.
  • Identification of implausible assumptions underpinning several critiques.
  • Confirmation of the original article's stance on the necessity of dual processes.

Conclusions:

  • The criticisms by Stigler et al. are largely unsubstantiated.
  • Theories of cognitive development must incorporate both domain-specific and general cognitive mechanisms for comprehensive explanation.