Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
Published on: August 30, 2016
A Joint Power Approach to Define Countermovement Jump Phases Using Force Platforms
John R Harry1, Leland A Barker2, Max R Paquette3
1Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
Defining countermovement vertical jump (CMVJ) phases using joint power analysis and ground reaction forces (GRF) allows for accurate assessment of performance factors. This method enables reliable identification of unloading and eccentric phases using common equipment.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Human Movement Analysis
- Sports Science
Background:
- Standardized definitions for countermovement vertical jump (CMVJ) phases are lacking, hindering the identification of key performance-enhancing factors like rate of force development.
- Existing methodologies for defining CMVJ phases are inconsistent, limiting detailed analysis of jump mechanics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To define countermovement vertical jump (CMVJ) phases using a joint power approach, specifically identifying body weight unloading and eccentric (braking) actions.
- To determine if these defined CMVJ phases can be reliably identified using only ground reaction force (GRF) data.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a joint power approach, calculating hip, knee, and ankle joint powers from inverse dynamics and joint angular velocities.
- Defined CMVJ phases (unloading, eccentric, concentric) based on the net sum of joint powers (JPSUM) and linked them to GRF and center of mass velocity.
- Obtained kinematic and GRF data from 21 male participants performing maximal CMVJs.
Main Results:
- The unloading and eccentric phases of the CMVJ were precisely identified using the JPSUM method.
- Reliability for detecting the unloading phase was moderate (ICC, 0.578), while the eccentric phase showed excellent reliability (ICC, 0.993).
- The eccentric phase can be further divided into yielding and braking subphases for more detailed analysis.
Conclusions:
- Countermovement vertical jump (CMVJ) phases, defined by integrating joint and center of mass mechanics, are detectable using solely force platform (GRF) data.
- This approach enables functionally relevant CMVJ assessments with commonly available equipment for practitioners.
- The proposed method offers a reliable and practical way to analyze CMVJ mechanics and identify performance-enhancing factors.
Related Concept Videos
Two-Dimensional Force System
Two-Dimensional Force System: Problem Solving
The first step to solving a two-dimensional force system problem is to draw a free-body diagram of the object under consideration. This diagram helps identify all the external forces acting on the object, including their...
Hydraulic Jump: Problem Solving
Three-Dimensional Force System:Problem Solving
To solve a three-dimensional force system, first resolve each force into its respective scalar components. Do this using...
Three-Dimensional Force System
Power Expended by a Constant Force

