Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Assessing Changes in Volatile General Anesthetic Sensitivity of Mice after Local or Systemic Pharmacological Intervention
Published on: October 16, 2013
Evaluating NeuroSENSE for assessing depth of hypnosis during desflurane anesthesia: an adaptive,
Matthias Görges1,2, Nicholas C West3, Erin M Cooke3,4
1Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. mgorges@bcchr.ca.
Purpose:
Processed electroencephalography (EEG) monitors support depth-of-hypnosis assessment during anesthesia. This randomized-controlled trial investigated the performance of the NeuroSENSE electroencephalography (EEG) monitor to determine whether its wavelet anesthetic value for central nervous system (WAVCNS) index distinguishes consciousness from unconsciousness during induction of anesthesia (as assessed by the anesthesiologist) and emergence from anesthesia (indicated by patient responsiveness), and whether it correlates with changes in desflurane minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) during maintenance of anesthesia.
Methods:
EEG was collected using a fronto-temporal bilateral montage. The WAVCNS was continuously recorded by the NeuroSENSE monitor, to which the anesthesiologist was blinded. Anesthesia was induced with propofol/remifentanil and maintained with desflurane, with randomized changes of -0.4, 0, or +0.4 MAC every 7.5 min within the 0.8-1.6 MAC range, if clinically acceptable to the anesthesiologist. During emergence from anesthesia, desflurane was stepped down by 0.2 MAC every five minutes.
Results:
Data from 75 patients with a median [interquartile range] age of 41[35-52] yr were obtained. The WAVCNS distinguished consciousness from unconsciousness as assessed by the anesthesiologist, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 99.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 98.5 to 100.0) at loss of consciousness and 99.4% (95% CI, 98.5 to 100.0) at return of consciousness. Bilateral WAVCNS changes correlated with desflurane concentrations, with -8.0 and -8.6 WAVCNS units, respectively, per 1 MAC change in the 0.8-1.6 MAC range during maintenance of anesthesia and -10.0 and -10.5 WAVCNS units, respectively, in the 0.4-1.6 MAC range including emergence from anesthesia.
Conclusion:
The NeuroSENSE monitor can reliably discriminate between consciousness and unconsciousness, as assessed by the anesthesiologist, during induction of anesthesia and with a lower level of reliability during emergence from anesthesia. The WAVCNS correlates with desflurane concentration but plateaus at higher concentrations, similar to other EEG monitors, which suggests limited utility to titrate higher concentrations of anesthetic vapour.
Trial Registration:
clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02088671; registered 17 March, 2014.
More Related Videos
06:33Method for Simultaneous fMRI/EEG Data Collection during a Focused Attention Suggestion for Differential Thermal Sensation
Published on: January 5, 2014
14:52Recording Brain Electromagnetic Activity During the Administration of the Gaseous Anesthetic Agents Xenon and Nitrous Oxide in Healthy Volunteers
Published on: January 13, 2018