Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures
Published on: May 16, 2025
Retrospective cohort study of three-wall orbital resection for treatment of endocrine orbitopathy using 3D
Evgeny Gladilin1, Thomas Hierl2, Ina Sterker3
1German Cancer Research Center, Div. Bioinformatics and Omics Data Analytics, Mathematikon - Berliner Str. 41, Heidelberg 69120, Germany; University Heidelberg, BioQuant, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Background:
Surgical treatment of endocrine orbitopathy can be performed by way of resecting orbital walls, which effectively releases superfluous tissue from the surgically enlarged orbital space allowing the eyeballs to move back. Existing approaches aim to select an optimal surgical strategy based on statistical correlations between the extent of the surgical procedure and the resulting bulbus displacement but do not provide an individual surgery plan or predict surgery outcome.
Methods:
In this retrospective study, we performed a quantitative analysis of pre- and post-surgery 3D tomographic data of six patients and applied explorative biomechanical modeling of orbital mechanics to dissect factors influencing patient-specific outcome.
Findings:
Our experimental results showed a large variability of the backward eyeball displacement in dependency on the amount of orbital volume flow, which could partially be described by computational simulation. Our detailed analysis revealed that patients with regular fat tissue show a good correlation between bulbus displacement and relative volume of decompressed tissue, which, in turn, correlates with decrease in hydrostatic pressure. In contrast, patients with fibrotic tissue exhibit significantly reduced and computationally less predictable eyeball translation in response to surgical tissue decompression.
Interpretation:
Based on the results of this study we see a great potential for quantitative planning of surgical exophthalmos treatment using 3D biomechanical modeling. Conventional approaches to planning of soft tissue interventions consider, however, only the patient's 3D anatomy and widely disregard individual tissue properties. Further investigations are required to establish reliable procedures for assessment of individual tissue properties and incorporating them into patient-specific models of orbital mechanics.

