Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2026

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
Published on: March 19, 2020
Grab bar loading resulting from unexpected balance loss during bathing transfers
Konika Nirmalanathan1, Iris C Levine1, Philippa C Gosine1
1KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, 13-000, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2A2, Canada.
Background:
Bathtub transfers can be challenging for older adults, and may result in balance loss. While grab bars can be used to help prevent a fall during a balance perturbation, it is unclear what loading demands are placed on grab bars during balance recovery, and how loading differs between proactive and reactive grasp strategies, or between older and younger adults.
Methods:
Twenty healthy younger adults (20-33 years) and 10 healthy older adults (65-74 years) underwent simulated bathing transfers in a slippery bathtub. The younger adults used proactive or reactive grasp strategies, and the older adults used proactive grasp strategies only. Three grab bar configurations (high and low horizontal, vertical) were evaluated. In randomly-selected trials, a balance perturbation was delivered, and grab bar loading was measured and normalized to body weight.
Findings:
No falls were observed. Overall resultant forces averaged 21.1% body weight (maximum 43.7%), and were greater for the low horizontal grab bar than the vertical grab bar. Forces were greatest in the downwards direction. Grab bar loading was similar between older and younger adults, except for forces pulling the grab bar away from the wall. Younger adult participants who used a proactive grasp strategy were able to generate greater loads on the grab bar, than those who used a reactive grasp strategy.
Interpretation:
Grasp strategy and grab bar configuration impact grab bar loading, with implications for clinical recommendations for grab bar installation. Grab bars installed in low configurations may require greater structural strength from grab bars, walls and supporting materials.
Related Concept Videos
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
Apparent Weight
Consider a person standing on a bathroom scale inside an elevator. If the scale is accurate at rest, its reading equals the...
Euler's Formula to Columns: Problem Solving
The system comprises two vertical rigid bars, AB and BC, of...
Free-body Diagrams: Problem Solving
For example, consider a block with a mass of 10 kg released on an inclined plane at an angle of 30° to the horizontal, where the...
Impact Loading on a Cantilever Beam
When an object is dropped onto the free end of a cantilever, its potential energy due to gravity is...
Archimedes' Principle