Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Development and Evaluation of Novel Electronic Medical Record Tools For Avoiding Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary
Joseph Ebinger1,2, Timothy Henry3, Sungjin Kim4
1Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute Los Angeles CA.
Insights
Integrating electronic medical record alerts for bleeding risk assessment in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) changed clinical practice by increasing radial access and decreasing certain medications. However, overall bleeding event rates remained stable, indicating a need for careful strategy application.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Informatics
- Clinical Practice Improvement
Background:
- Bleeding is a primary complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Current guidelines advocate for pre-PCI bleeding risk assessment to guide bleeding avoidance strategies.
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center developed an electronic medical record (EMR) initiative to implement these guidelines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility and impact of integrating bleeding risk assessment into the EMR for PCI procedures.
- To evaluate changes in the utilization of bleeding avoidance strategies and bleeding event rates post-intervention.
Main Methods:
- Implementation of a voluntary EMR clinical decision alert for bleeding risk assessment.
- Inclusion of a bleeding risk calculator tool based on the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) model.
- A second alert suggested 4 bleeding avoidance strategies when indicated.
- Comparison of PCI procedures before and after EMR intervention, and with/without the risk calculator.
Main Results:
- Radial access significantly increased (47.6% to 64.8%) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use decreased (12.8% to 3.17%) post-implementation.
- Risk-adjusted bleeding event rates remained stable (OR, 0.82; P=0.164), even in high-risk patients.
- Use of the bleeding risk calculator correlated with increased radial access and reduced glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, but not with changes in bleeding events.
Conclusions:
- Integrating guideline-based bleeding risk assessment into the EMR is feasible and drives changes in clinical practice for PCI.
- Further research is necessary to optimize the use of bleeding avoidance strategies, preventing overuse in low-risk patients and ensuring appropriate risk-benefit assessment in high-risk patients.
Abstract:
Background Bleeding remains the most common complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. Guidelines recommend assessing bleeding risk before percutaneous coronary intervention to target use of bleeding avoidance strategies and mitigate bleeding events. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center undertook an initiative to integrate these recommendations into the electronic medical record. Methods and Results The intervention included a voluntary clinical decision alert to assess bleeding risk before percutaneous coronary intervention, a bleeding risk calculator tool based on the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) risk prediction model and, when indicated, a second alert to consider 4 bleeding avoidance strategies. We tested for changes in the use of bleeding avoidance strategies and bleeding event rates by comparing procedures performed before versus after implementation of the electronic medical record-based intervention and with versus without use of the bleeding risk calculator tool. Use of radial access increased (47.6% versus 64.8%; P<0.001) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors decreased (12.8% versus 3.17%; P<0.001) from before to after implementation, though risk-adjusted bleeding event rates were stable (odds ratio, 0.82; P=0.164), even for high-risk procedures. Use versus nonuse of the bleeding risk calculator tool was associated with increased radial access and reductions in glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, but no change in bleeding events. Conclusions Integrating guideline recommendations into the electronic medical record to promote assessments of bleeding risk and use of bleeding avoidance strategies was feasible and associated with changes in clinical practice. Future work is needed to ensure that bleeding avoidance strategies are not overused among lower-risk patients, and that, for high-risk patients, the potential benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention are carefully weighed against the risk of bleeding.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview

