Spontaneous and harmaline-stimulated Purkinje cell activity in rats with a genetic movement disorder

The genetically dystonic rat (dt) displays a complex movement disorder in the absence of morphological defects in the nervous system. This mutant is also insensitive to the tremorogenic effects of harmaline. Because harmaline is known to act on the cells of the inferior olive to induce activity at the tremor frequency in the olivocerebellobulbar pathway, this pathway has been investigated as a possible site of a defect in the dt rat. Biochemical studies suggested the presence of abnormalities at the level of the Purkinje cell or its afferent input. Thus, the present study investigated the harmaline response of Purkinje cells in dt rats and unaffected littermate controls with extracellular single-unit recording techniques. The spontaneous, simple spike and complex spike firing rates of dt rats were significantly lower than those of normal littermate controls. In normal rats, 2 responses to systemic harmaline injection were seen. Simple spikes were either completely suppressed for periods of 30-180 min, or were intermittently suppressed, pausing repeatedly for periods of 1-18 sec. Cells that showed complete suppression of simple spike activity also showed increased frequency and rhythmicity of complex spikes. In dt rats, intermittent simple spike responses were seen in a proportion (41%) similar to that in normal rats (53%). However, the proportion of cells showing high-frequency, rhythmic, complex spikes and complete suppression of simple spikes was low in the dt rats in comparison with littermate controls (18 versus 47%). In addition, 41% of the cells from dt rats displayed no change, or an anomalous change, in firing patterns in response to harmaline. Since the rhythmic activation of olivary neurons that results in the rhythmic, complex spike discharge of Purkinje cells is assumed to be responsible for the appearance of harmaline tremor, the failure of the dt rat to display tremor is most likely due to a failure at the olivocerebellar level, rather than at a site efferent to the cerebellum.