Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band
Published on: May 2, 2018
Permissible Area Analyses of Measurement Errors with Required Fault Diagnosability Performance
Dong-Nian Jiang1,2, Wei Li1,2
1College of Electrical and Information Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China.
This study introduces a new method to evaluate fault diagnosability, accounting for measurement errors. The approach enhances diagnostic accuracy and system safety by analyzing permissible error areas.
Area of Science:
- Systems Engineering
- Control Theory
- Signal Processing
Background:
- Fault diagnosability is crucial for reliable fault diagnosis.
- Existing quantitative evaluation methods are often inadequate due to measurement errors.
- Improving fault diagnosability enhances overall system safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a novel method for quantitative fault diagnosability evaluation that accounts for measurement errors.
- To improve the accuracy and reliability of fault diagnosis systems.
- To enhance system safety by mitigating the impact of measurement uncertainties.
Main Methods:
- A permissible area analysis of measurement errors is developed for quantitative fault diagnosability evaluation.
- Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) is utilized to design the permissible error area, ensuring residuals follow a normal distribution.
- Sparse kernel density estimation and the Monte Carlo method are employed to address challenges in KLD calculation.
Main Results:
- The proposed method provides a more accurate quantitative evaluation of fault diagnosability under measurement errors.
- The Kullback-Leibler divergence based permissible area design effectively handles measurement uncertainties.
- The feasibility and validity of the method are demonstrated through a practical case study.
Conclusions:
- The developed permissible area analysis method offers a robust approach to fault diagnosability evaluation in the presence of measurement errors.
- This method significantly improves the accuracy of quantitative fault diagnosability assessment.
- The findings contribute to enhanced system safety and reliability in fault diagnosis applications.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Random and Systematic Errors

