Internal Medicine Residency Program Directors' Screening Practices and Perceptions About Recruitment Challenges.
Steven V Angus1, Christopher M Williams, Emily A Stewart
1S.V. Angus is designated institutional official and professor, Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut. C.M. Williams is a PhD student, University of Maryland, School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral and Community Health, College Park, Maryland; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5767-8048. E.A. Stewart is associate professor of medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. M. Sweet is assistant professor, Department of Hospital Medicine, Rush University College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. M. Kisielewski is surveys and research manager, Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, Alexandria, Virginia. L.L. Willett is professor, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Internal medicine residency program directors heavily use United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores but also value non-USMLE criteria. Many programs adapted recruitment strategies due to increased applications and supported solutions to manage application inflation.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Residency Recruitment
- Graduate Medical Education
Background:
- Application inflation presents significant challenges for internal medicine residency programs.
- Program directors (PDs) face difficulties in efficiently screening a growing number of applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the screening practices of internal medicine residency program directors.
- To understand PDs' perceptions of current recruitment challenges and application inflation.
Main Methods:
- A survey was distributed to 373 Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine member residency programs in March-May 2017.
- PDs rated the importance of inclusion/exclusion criteria, provided United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) cutoff scores, and reported recruitment practice adjustments.
- Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify key decision-making factors for interview invitations.
Main Results:
- USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores were frequently deemed
- very important
- by 57% of respondents.
- While USMLE scores are crucial, non-USMLE criteria were more often identified as the single most important (SMI) criterion (68%).
- Most programs (64%) adjusted recruitment practices due to increased applications, with strong interest in limiting applications per applicant (71%) and facilitating program signaling (66%).
Conclusions:
- Internal medicine PDs utilize USMLE scores heavily but also prioritize non-USMLE factors for screening.
- Residency programs are actively adapting recruitment strategies to address application volume.
- Potential solutions for application inflation, such as limiting applications and program signaling, are widely supported.
Related Concept Videos
Surveys
Blind Procedures
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:


