Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
9.7K
Self-serving incentives impair collective decisions by increasing conformity
Sepideh Bazazi1, Jorina von Zimmermann2, Bahador Bahrami3
1Independent researcher, London, United Kingdom.
Plos One
|November 15, 2019
Summary
Individual incentives can decrease collective intelligence by promoting conformity. Rewarding group performance, however, enhances diversity and the wisdom of crowds.
Area of Science:
- Decision-making
- Social psychology
- Collective intelligence
Background:
- The "wisdom of the crowd" phenomenon suggests group judgment surpasses individual expertise.
- However, the impact of incentives and social information on collective intelligence is not fully understood.
- Existing beliefs link individual incentives to diverse thinking, but empirical evidence is mixed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how individual versus group reward structures influence collective intelligence.
- To examine the role of social information in moderating the effects of incentives on group estimation tasks.
- To determine if individual incentives inherently reduce or enhance collective decision-making.
Main Methods:
- An interactive group estimation task was designed to measure collective intelligence.
- Participants were assigned to either individual or group performance-based reward conditions.
- Social information (visibility of others' responses) was manipulated across conditions.
Main Results:
- Knowledge of others' responses decreased the wisdom of the crowd.
- Individual rewards led to increased social conformity and reduced diversity, diminishing group wisdom.
- Group rewards fostered opinion diversity and enhanced collective intelligence.
Conclusions:
- The common assumption that individual incentives foster independent thought requires revision.
- Reward structures significantly mediate the impact of social information on collective intelligence.
- Group-based incentives are more effective in promoting diversity and collective wisdom.
Related Concept Videos
Groupthink
48.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
48.9K
Social Proof
31.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
31.4K
Conformity
47.7K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
47.7K
Self-Serving Bias
169
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
169
Deindividuation
30.2K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
30.2K
Persuasion Strategies
42.9K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
42.9K

