Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Isolation01:24

DNA Isolation

44.3K
DNA isolation protocols can be fast and straightforward or complex and time-consuming depending on the type and quality of DNA required for further processing. For example, plasmid DNA extraction is a bit more complicated than genomic DNA extraction because of the need for an appropriate lysis method to separate plasmid DNA from gDNA during isolation. However, for specific applications, such as long-range DNA sequencing that require a good yield of high- quality DNA samples, we need to follow...
44.3K
DNA Isolation01:34

DNA Isolation

198.8K
DNA from cells is required for many biotechnology and research applications, such as molecular cloning. To remove and purify DNA from cells, researchers use various methods of DNA extraction. While the specifics of different protocols may vary, some general concepts underlie the process of DNA extraction.
198.8K
DNA Microarrays02:34

DNA Microarrays

20.5K
Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...
20.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Role of genomic science in males with breast cancer.

Nursing·2026
Same author

Beyond Checking a Box: Embracing and Navigating Ethical Authorship.

Clinical journal of oncology nursing·2026
Same author

Errors in Germline Biomarker Testing: Significant Consequences and Missed Opportunities for Cancer Control in Patients and Their Families.

Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Quality and Safety Imperatives in the Identification and Management of Hereditary Cancer Syndromes.

Seminars in oncology nursing·2026
Same author

Educating Nurses for Genomics-Informed Cancer Care: Strengthening the Current and Future Workforce.

Seminars in oncology nursing·2026
Same author

Deciphering TP53 Mosaic Variants on Germline Biomarker Testing: Implications for Oncology Nurses.

Clinical journal of oncology nursing·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis
11:08

Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Published on: June 19, 2018

10.1K

The DNA of a Testing Scam.

Suzanne M Mahon1

  • 1Saint Louis University.

Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing
|November 16, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Federal agents uncovered widespread genetic testing fraud in 2019, leading to charges against 35 individuals. These scams defrauded federal healthcare programs of an estimated $2.1 billion through deceptive marketing and improper provider arrangements.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Fraud
  • Genetic Testing Industry
  • Medical Billing

Background:

  • In September 2019, federal agents executed raids on numerous genetic testing laboratories.
  • This action was a response to extensive fraudulent activities within the genetic testing sector.
  • An estimated $2.1 billion in losses to federal healthcare insurance programs were linked to these fraudulent schemes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the fraudulent practices in genetic testing laboratories.
  • To understand the mechanisms of genetic testing scams targeting federal healthcare programs.
  • To report on the legal actions taken against individuals involved in these fraudulent activities.

Main Methods:

  • Law enforcement actions including raids on genetic testing facilities.
Keywords:
advocacygenetic testingidentity theftscam

More Related Videos

Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Genetic Variation in a Sporadic Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Patient Using the Chip-in-a-tube Format
05:58

Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Genetic Variation in a Sporadic Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Patient Using the Chip-in-a-tube Format

Published on: August 20, 2018

11.3K
Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization
16:37

Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Published on: August 5, 2008

13.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis
11:08

Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Published on: June 19, 2018

10.1K
Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Genetic Variation in a Sporadic Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Patient Using the Chip-in-a-tube Format
05:58

Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Genetic Variation in a Sporadic Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Patient Using the Chip-in-a-tube Format

Published on: August 20, 2018

11.3K
Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization
16:37

Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Published on: August 5, 2008

13.2K
  • Legal charges filed against 35 individuals involved in fraudulent genetic testing.
  • Analysis of financial losses incurred by federal healthcare insurance programs.

    • Main Results:

    • Thirty-five individuals were charged with fraudulent genetic testing.
    • Estimated financial losses to federal healthcare insurance programs reached $2.1 billion.
    • Fraudulent schemes involved deceptive telemarketing and "arrangements" with healthcare providers.

    Conclusions:

    • The genetic testing industry was implicated in significant healthcare fraud.
    • Deceptive practices and improper provider incentives were key elements of the scams.
    • Federal intervention led to charges and highlighted the vulnerability of healthcare programs to such fraud.