Mutagenic characterization of cholesterol epoxides in Chinese hamster V79 cells

The uptake, metabolism and alkylating properties of the diastereomeric cholesterol epoxides were studied using Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79 cells). Specific emphasis is given to the comparative cyto- and geno-toxic effects of cholesterol 5 beta,6 beta-epoxide (beta CE) and cholesterol 5 alpha,6 alpha-epoxide (alpha CE) and data are provided for the first time indicating that beta CE can induce more 6-thioguanine-resistant cells than alpha CE. Cholesterol 5 beta,6 beta-epoxide induced colonies of cells resistant to 6-thioguanine at 2-3-fold the frequencies observed with the alpha-isomer, but neither compound produced ouabain-resistant colonies. The cytotoxicity (LD50) of alpha CE was estimated to be 45-50 microM whereas beta CE displayed an LD50 of 25-29 microM. Inhibition of DNA synthesis (IC50) was observed over the same dose ranges as the LD50 for each epoxide isomer. The epoxides were assimilated by cells to an equal extent, however, beta CE was metabolized to cholestane 3 beta,5 alpha-6 beta-triol twice as rapidly as the alpha-isomer. Both epoxides reacted with 4-(4'-nitrobenzyl)-pyridine to a similar extent, and with identical nucleophilic selectivity at pH 7.4, but their alkylating activity was estimated on this basis to be two orders of magnitude less than methyl methanesulfonate. Binding experiments with the DNA or cultured V79 cells or with calf-thymus DNA indicated that interactions were noncovalent and DNA binding did not correlate with the potency of the epoxides to induce the 6-thioguanine-resistant phenotype. Our results could be interpreted as indicating that both cholesterol epoxide isomers are weak mutagens or that they might induce some epigenetic event repressing the hypoxanthine guanine-phosphoribosyltransferase gene. The similarity of the epoxides' alkylating activity and their DNA-binding properties are inconsistent with their different potencies in inducing the 6-thioguanine-resistant phenotype, suggesting that the mechanism leading to this phenotype is not necessarily the result of DNA alkylation.