A comparison between the TEG 6s and TEG 5000 analyzers to assess coagulation in trauma patients

Matthew D Neal1, Ernest E Moore, Mark Walsh

  • 1From the Departments of Surgery, Critical Care Medicine, and the Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) (M.D.N.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health (E.E.M.), Denver, Colorado; Memorial Hospital of South Bend (M.W., S.T.), South Bend, Indiana; Department of Surgery (R.A.C., L.Z.K.), Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California; Division of Trauma, Critical Care & Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (M.S.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Wright State University (A.P.E.), Dayton, Ohio; Stony Brook Department of Emergency Medicine (A.J.S.), Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York; Department of Surgery, Florida Atlantic University, St. Mary's Medical Center (L.L.), West Palm Beach, Florida; Division of Trauma, Acute Care, and Critical Care Surgery (M.F.), Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (S.E.), Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina; University of Kansas Medical Center (R.D.W.), University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas; Department of Surgery (M.D.G.), University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio; SSM Health (C.F.), Saint Louis University Hospital, St Louis, Missouri; Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (D.M.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Department of Surgery (N.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; and Haemonetics Corporation (J.H., H.E.A.), Braintree, Massachusetts.