Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Rapid Fractionation and Isolation of Whole Blood Components in Samples Obtained from a Community-based Setting
Published on: November 30, 2015
Project RedDE: Cluster Randomized Trial to Reduce Missed or Delayed Abnormal Laboratory Value Actions
Michael L Rinke1, David G Bundy2, Christoph U Lehmann3
1Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital at Montefiore and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, N.Y.
A quality improvement collaborative (QIC) did not immediately reduce abnormal laboratory result errors. However, sustained QIC efforts over time significantly improved patient follow-up actions.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
- Patient Safety
- Laboratory Medicine
Background:
- Failure to follow up on abnormal laboratory results is a common issue that can harm patients.
- This study aimed to assess if a quality improvement collaborative (QIC) could decrease missed or delayed actions on abnormal lab values.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a quality improvement collaborative (QIC) intervention in reducing errors in the follow-up of abnormal laboratory values within pediatric practices.
Main Methods:
- A national cohort of pediatric practices was cluster-randomized to a QIC intervention.
- The intervention included video conferences, data sharing, QI coaching, and specific tools.
- Generalized mixed-effects regression models were used to compare appropriate provider actions on abnormal laboratory values between control and intervention phases.
Main Results:
- The QIC intervention did not significantly change the percentage of patients receiving appropriate actions during the initial 8-month phase (Risk Difference [RD] 1%; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] -1%, 3%).
- Post-hoc analyses revealed significant improvements in later phases: control vs. sustain phase (RD 3%; 95% CI 0.3%, 6%) and control vs. maintenance phase (RD 6%; 95% CI 3%, 9%).
Conclusions:
- The quality improvement collaborative (QIC) did not reduce abnormal laboratory errors during the initial intervention period.
- Significant reductions in errors were observed when comparing the sustain and maintenance phases (9-24 months) to the control phase, indicating long-term benefits.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Blinding
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs